Page 11 - Thi Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> katie, dominion will need to, as i mentioned there, convince the jury that fox acted with quote, actual malice. talk t us a little through what thi means, how difficult it will b to prove >> so, this is why everybody keeps on saying, you are never seeing a case for defamation really go to trial, and yo certainly don't see one that i allegedly this strong on behal of dominion. actual malice, it is kind of one of these things that you can reel off the lega definition and ayman, you did great job in your set up t this block in terms of what th definition is. but having jury really understand i...

Might be in the works? >> yeah. so, you can settl even on the courthouse steps on the eve of trial, you can settle right before a jury verdict is rendered in the case, frankly, you could settle afte the verdict annual -- if you are going to appeal. everybody has wondered aloud why hasn' this case settled already. i seems to be the case tha dominion is barreling toward the finish line, towar success. and why has fox not pointed up the money? number one, we do know dominion i claiming billions of dollars i damages. let's be clear. compensatory damages in this case. the economic damages i this ca...

To have total reckless disregard, i'm just going to completely ignore whether or not there is truth going o with what we are putting forth and our viewers, we are goin to put it out there. >> can i ask you particularl about that point >> sure. >> can the dominion lawyers us the fact that the judge ha already said that they clearly were saying false information, or will that not be allowed in court? >> so, let me be clear. it i not like the dominion lawyer are going to get up in front o the jury and say, with thi judge. he has already said tha everything that fox did in thi case was false. they...

Before anybody else. that is the law of our land. so it is a ridiculous, he is right when he says that this i an unprecedented kind of subpoena he is right to do that, and think ultimately the court will say that he does not have to testify, nor does pomerantz because the we have an interview with the same ongoin investigation. he is trying to protect th rights of anyone under investigation, they have a right to secrecy for all of th information that is gathered and in their trial >> the right place to challeng it is once they get indicted and then you can challenge anything that is happening ...

Actively promoting the ver lies that fox news's defense u until now says they were not provided they were just sort of coverin other people saying these lies he basically said no, my hosts were doing it, and then he wen a step further and said that fox news was uniquel positioned to correct thes lies and didn't do anythin about it, and then the third i that there's so many emails an communications where ruper murdoch is being informed both by his own people, as well a by his board member paul ryan, saying as a pretty sherrie i have to let you know what we'r doing here is really dangerous we ne...