Page 6 - Warren Act News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Pressure will be on. >>trace: and the clock ticks. some republican lawmakers are not too thrilled the way this is handles. >>reporter: that is right. the administration has told the defense contractors if they get sued for not sending outlay off notices, the government will pick up the tab. senator graham said this is typical president obama politics, being supportive of the warren act when convenient and against it when it creates political downside. this is the most outcome based white house in memory. he is outraged the government is instructing businesses to violate the law. >>trace: thank...

>>guest: it is immoral. i give you that one. >>neil: you lawyers don't care about that. is it illegal? >>guest: in the terrible times of waste and fraud, the idea that the president thinks that he can just dig into the taxpayers and pledge money, take taxpayers money and say we will pay all the legal bills, all the compensation, don't send out the noticed which you are oblige by law to do, they will try to get around it by saying there is in certainty that sequestration will actually occur because they are hoping during the lame duck session they can somehowry solve this. but the requirement u...

A second term. lockheed's announcement that it will not issue job layoffs come as a welcome sign to the white house and is following the office of management and budget that employers will not have to comply with the warren act, to warn workers they could lose their jobs. now the omb issued new guidance to further minimize the waste and disruption associated assoch the issuance of unwarranted notices, this memorandum provides guidance regarding the allow ability of certain liability and litigation cost associated with this warn at compliance. >> politics and it's indefensible. you make the poi...

Walled the warren act and what that requires is that if there is going to be layoffs in defense industries, then the workers have to be notified 60 days ahead of time. that is a law. coincidentally if you count back from the first of january 2013 you are look at the first of january -- excuse me, the first of november of 2012 just before the election. that means people all over america in defense industries, jobs will lejob letts be notified they are losing their jobs. they are saying they don't have to do that. that is again in direct violation of the law. >> greta: the reason we are into thi...

Walled the warren act and what that requires is that if there is going to be layoffs in defense industries, then the workers have to be notified 60 days ahead of time. that is a law. coincidentally if you count back from the first of january 2013 you are look at the first of january -- excuse me, the first of november of 2012 just before the election. that means people all over america in defense industries, jobs will lejob letts be notified they are losing their jobs. they are saying they don't have to do that. that is again in direct violation of the law. >> greta: the reason we are into thi...