Page 2 - What Phil News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Republicans are hearing back home from their constituents. the one thing related to this but i want to add to what phil and manu were saying about how critical this phase is about how the articles of impeachment, not just how many but how they're crafted. i agree that it struck me when she said that the president leaves us no choice but talks about how he could corrupt the election again. it's entirely possible that that phrase or that notion would be part of an article of impeachment of abuse of power dealing with ukraine. and the reason is because, like phil was saying, i am also hearing fro...

President on this idea, but white house officials informed staff on capitol hill this is not something they are pursuing. democrats want no part of this. they have been led down this path before and republicans at the white house decided not to go in that direction. it's not on the table and we will see what happens. right now, no. >> thank you very much for the reporting. with me to share their reporting and insights. karen with "the washington post" and sirius xm. nancy cook with politico and npr. happy friday, everybody. >> let's just go off of what phil and abby were reporting. as we speak...

There's perfectly good justification to investigate the clintons for some of the things they have done. he has those statements out there. i can see what the president likes about them, but what phil says, you know, there's probably something to that, too, and here's a guy that is professional and may not take orders if they are political. >> definitely he has a record of saying things and written things about the president would like about what he wants the justice department to do, which is investigate hillary clinton and having skepticism of the mueller probe. but phil is right, if he gets ...

Philosophical collisions that probably didn't get enough attention other than folks who cover the legal side of this, don mcgahn was never for what phil and matt have described, he was never for this sort of accommodation of bob mueller's requests on document production and witness participation. don mcgahn wanted and needed an ally on executive privilege. my questions today that have gone unanswered is how do you put the toothpaste back in the tube. don mcgahn has spent two full days with mueller's investigators. if you were going to exert executive privilege, i don't know with whom you do it...

Way into the oval office to interview for an undisclosed job at the time. and that don mcgahn views him as his succession plan. if don mcgahn had his way, emmet flood will stay and don mcgahn will be gone in a matter of six to eight weeks. >> which firm again is a very rigorous way of doing it actually, to care enough about a hand-off to make it peaceful and orderly. >> and to find someone -- one of the big sort of legal philosophical collisions that probably didn't get enough attention, other than from folks like matt and people that covered the legal side of this, isn't that don mcgahn was n...