1 that upheld a decision by the
Environmental Appeal Board (the "
Board")
where an appeal was dismissed on the basis that the appellant,
Normtek Radiation Services Ltd.
("
Normtek"), lacked standing as it
failed to show that it was "directly affected" by the
administrative decision under review.
2 This is a significant decision by
the Court of Appeal as it potentially expands the test for standing
before the Board to include parties who's economic interests
may be affected even if not directly tied to an environmental
impact. In addition, this decision has the potential to expand the
scope of a hearing on the preliminary issue of standing before the