Transcripts For ALJAZ NEWSHOUR 20240712

Stability also this hour amalia man accused of torturing women and destroying ancient monuments in timbuktu goes on trial at the International Criminal court. Im joining us roscoe with the sport as the search begins for a new name for washingtons n. F. L. Team plus top and be a star Russell Westbrook test positive brain of virus and his most cases and find the links the socalled bubble activity world in florida. Thank you for joining us its been more than 3 years since for our symbols an economic blockade on qatar now the uns top court is about to make a major ruling on the dispute which has seen cuts are prevented from flying over there as space the International Court of justice is about to deliver its decision at the hague live pictures officials taking a seat there will go live to step outside the court in the hague in just a moment but 1st. Explains the background to the story his report. Folk ataris this has been a long battle on many fronts the International Court of justice is to issue its verdict on a dispute over airspace riots it began in june 2017 when sandy arabia u. A. E. Bashar ain and egypt sever ties with qatar and imposed a land sea and air blockade. Qatar took the case to the un calling on the International Civil Aviation Authority to declare the blockade illegal as part of the dispute the blockade in countries have barred qatari aircraft from entering their airspace which qatar says violates the convention on International Civil aviation referred to as the Chicago Convention of locating countries challenge the qatari move saying the u. N. Agency doesnt have jurisdiction to handle the case but into a 1018 the International Civil Aviation Authority rejected that claim insisting that it does have jurisdiction the mast own but we are not there yet in terms of qatars progress because while qatar will move a step closer into regaining airspace access that they like the rest of the world are entitled to fly over actually i k i have never dealt with anything quite like this in over that 70 years of existence then you can expect running in parallel to this a separate case that will be seeking compensation this isnt the 1st legal fight between qatar and its neighbors in 2018 the qatari government took legal action against the u. A. E. At the hague based court accusing it of a series of measures targeting qatari nationals those measures broke up families denied qatari students access to universities and medical facilities in the u. A. E. The Court Ordered the u. A. E. To allow families to be reunited and qatari students to be given the chance to complete their education in the emirates but i think thats part of the structure. Or is there a sense to Group Doctors that. You need to are a solid legal basis for saying that the blockade was was our lord or the consequences or the blockade results. Looked at her legal action to international to mend fences between the blockade in countries have so far failed and the International Community has long been concerned that the blockade of gaza has undermined stability of the region. Lets show you some live pictures now from the i. C. J. The International Court of justice which has begun delivering its verdict in a case involving qatar and its neighbors as you heard there bahrain egypt saudi arabia and the u. A. E. Appealed to the i. C. J. About the jurisdiction of the International Civil Aviation Organization i calle Council Qatar had filed the case at over the air space bill kate imposed by its neighbors and so today the i. C. J. Is expected to rule confirming the i. C. At the i. K. O. Is jurisdiction whether or not i care has a jurisdiction to decide on the case lets listen in to what the judges have to say. So we get it here and the united. Way indicated. You and the article 2 section 2 we have the idea of course for all by any of them. For having one you know in. All of these differences do not to resolve different legal conclusions indicate. That of being very necessary for a while. To take them into account. According up sort of people you have to be 5 to 12 back to. Your faith hope for peace open to both. I would only detect that often because it is judged in the fairest cage of degenerate by the nice which is for all who are equally if all of the chicago. A city god is the 2nd. Brought person you and people to sit in for the i. A. S. I went on that he doll the op ed up to par because of his judgement that. Since you told a sure low premium product that he bought a good office of the judgement which you refer to depose each of our cases on people who abuse the submission is of the past. Also for me or summarize some particular piece of the judge. If you. Or balls judge and it will be all of the rules of the sea. A show now begin with a brief somebody off the fact. Under procedure ill use that call to pull. Off an open door 27. 00 pm the government is off bahrain egypt saudi arabia and the united out of immunity if. You could lesion is with. Its year it is your 1st pick youve made relating to to us 30. 00. 000 lines of communication with. Which included certain of you you can. Pursuant to decision truthfulness all of our thoughts are in just the just put it where the are felonies from london out or departing from there or i will deny their right to overfly their perspective. Including the territorial seas within the relevant information. So everything interests think it is also up a lie too long bridges 30 flying form from. Which were required to or they pry out of one from the sea that have vision or thought it is of their pillow. According to their pet a lot of these the distinctive measures were taking this falls to cut that is a lake of its obligations under certain thin for much and i like the human too which is the up bell on the other part is included in the agreement of 23 and 20 form of ember 2030 as well as the American Implement in the union of civic in every 2040 under supplementary year the given of speech in november 24th in which a show very fair to us the. On foot through october 27th 2 sets of proceeding is feeling to the vision of this direction is where the need heated by. Asian is fighting with the commons. In the 3rd is that location initiate its. The president of the International Court of justice in the process there of delivering his verdict in the case involving qatar and its neighboring countries over the blockade the air blockade preventing contact from using the airspace of saudi arabia bahrain the u. A. E. And egypt we have stepped outside the court for us at the hague this is an unprecedented situation for the International Court of justice a complicated case that talk us through for us how this is all going to unfold today. Thats an oddly a very complicated case but also a very important case to the president of the criminal of the court of justice of the use of has just starting to read to judgment and he explained in the beginning that its basically 2 cases that have been filed and that he is giving a verdict about but he sat because one case and thats connected to article 84. 00 of the socalled she cargo agreements signed in 94 to 4 by a lot of International Countries about basically the freedom of movement in airspace the freedom of passenger traffic exactly what qatar wants to achieve that agreement has been signed by all 4 countries by saudi arabia by bahrain by egypt and the u. A. E. Theres another case and that air Services Transit agreement also signed in 1944 which has been filed as well but saudi arabia saudi arabia has not signed this agreement so he sat i will read the charge went on the 84. 00 to Chicago Convention mostly and then he will give a summary on the other case so its very complicated but both cases dealing with the same issue which is freedom of movement and the right for countries to fly over out of countries which as we know has been restricted to qatar 3 years ago so its definitely a very important ruling what he is doing right now is stablish ing if the a. O. Has jurisdiction and thats the main question here and of course the 4 countries that have filed this appeal they have said that ike has no jurisdiction and that they are basically a logic Logistical Organization and this case according to them deals with Security Issues and we will have to hear the judgment exactly what the president will decide it is many options of course on the table and its possible that i go has to do its her. Oh were getting so right well have to listen in and see what he says and itll take a little time before we actually know what the final verdict is because the president of the i. C. J. House will read through a number of procedures and bring us some more information and background to the case for the moment thank you well check in with you later of course lets not bring in hashem whos here. With us. Ok before i bring you back in lets listen once again to the president of the i. C. J. Police to form of the convention on International Civil aviation. If so why did the fia why when i thought of him being the father of the ticket up 27 in which you could call discuss it is up to the function and the school of the 5 or 4 people to call. Did join. Was before the is indeed present the case is made and that ive completed 4 tetovo from the engine. Was ernies the decision of the council on debris even though the objection is we do freeze it in deploy before. The 34. 00 particularly to 4 thats not 55. 00 with all the find of the season is the constant on dimity just be it for the subject to a piece. Because certainly. Piece of need to do it again is the decision of the cult. It is a 972. 00 in judgment in the up he lit into the jurisdiction of the here comes the india suspect foul because they explained it that it would be too accepted stunned this new Good Administration of justice to allow an International Order go to examine and discuss the merits of it just when you just competent to do so was not only an effect but to challenge. Those who did that and up the law against the decision of the council are still the jurisdiction must therefore be the receiver. It is from the stump the point of the supervision by people of the valley over the coals that is that there is norm ground for distinguishing between supervision must do distinction and supervision are still married and. Consequently because of these thoughts that he has jurisdiction to interfere in the present up to you if you notice however that this one couple disagree on the score of the poppy. Dick or recall that keeps up early or all with respect to the exercise by the council of its disputed element functions that are completed for each convention is to defer to mean whether the view any decision is correct. In the present styles is to decide whether because it was. You can put him in that he objects units of their parallel to the jurisdiction of the calle constant mis ability of other. Therefore know what the penalties raise for the groundswell poppy i get is the decision of very kill constant heathkit 1 june 28th. Fair that they submit that the decision or should be set aside on the grounds that the procedures are dropped by the kale considering whats money test the for all i mean very early or fundamental is the police of due process on the fly. And before he. In their 2nd round of appeals. Has not said that detail calls in and i will. In fact unlawful in the executive for the military objects made by them respectful of the comp and of the kill cons and before. According to the op ed along with that of many asian off the real issue in dispute would require the council to move on question is the fall out. Specifically on the law when this offer to come from included says every speech 55. 00 if. You appellant. In the Old Testament for the same reasons they added that the clean this. Is not missing. Under their good elbow puppy in the pedal on his. Constant. When you project their 2nd but if you mean. That the objection will speak on the outset. He used 2 sorts of people and he should of negotiation contain if theyre not particularly true for. The. As part of that objection they also add a new that became the stuff where he not deceitful because had not complied with the procedure of requirement enough people to stop putting it out of the movies for the settlement of the for the. Although the upper limit is he involved. In the balls mentioned in order the decor is not to full or. Decor all that for example and he says he ground this meaning to the i laid. Off day kale calls and interject the Death Penalty so objection that i recall can see that is because i wont be seen on the other they get money 1st the lack of due process in the procedure before becomes. With respect to the 2nd round of puppy in which relate this to the fed is it but it may not be your particular case the before cael comes the up in a long piece that their actions including in particular the vision of his prediction is quite astute to a set of measures and i will adopt the concrete action tool part that is multiple 3 fifths of breaches of its information i will be in. Philly can tell my party is essential to their security. Until it is just to rove compliment or put eyes on it by General Information i will and before think. They express it give you that on the topic of the 2 for each you cover convention your distinction of the columns that you seeing if any disagreement between 2 or more spin. Relates to the interpretation all of you cation of the convention on its side in its. And that becomes the therefore does not have jurisdiction good to get the issues as to whether out of. As. You gave on that infamous and i will include the mortgage in these with the agreement. The core has fairness to the examination with the dispute. Before they kill comes that he said he said he meant it when their fellow stump up the leading to the interpretation what are you casing of each cover. On its own its. In this conflict before. That it comes to this jurisdiction plus jaan in my opinion is something that is super comes out i mean its not particularly good for you to cover convention to this by a few seconds. As they call explaining in 1972. That this agreement in late eightys to the interpretation or a beautician of the Chicago Convention if in order to determine. The coliseum in order to give your blood to intel to put it on the up by the company. To gene with unchristian if we didnt have a few. In supplication on memory i will submit it to gary cale comes the wanted kill over 27 in his quest it becomes a tool and i hope. That they dont mean that there is one that is vitally needed by their actions against the state of their obligation is on the cover convention its not an expense on the other rooms of internet for mobile. Its further quests if you count in the tool and i differ all devotedly should despite that is fondant is of the fundamental principles of if you cover on very thin understanding it seems and go for the. Consequent can you got. To respond. To what we are all we dont believe all of his fiction is in full swing. Or just putting it off until comply with that obligation is something that you cover on vacation and its ironic since. That to negotiating in good faith if you chose other morning u. S. Corporation in the region to save the safety security. And economy often top notch and i. And before didnt. Help out also identified a number of provisions of the chicago home. With which it is view the measure is taken by. Most. The call for incident the disagreement between the fall of 2000 brought before the calle coliseum on set is the interpretation of the chicago meets on its own therefore for this within the school or particularly the fall of the comedy. The me of. This disagreement. In a broader context does not that but i think ale constant or judas diction but are physically too full of become very. Normal or accept that. Because of the upset a lot of his kind of thought eyes that ive usually restrictionist in pulls it off or just put it us in the comfort of many. The coincidence us nor jurisdiction to hear the claims of. Comfort measure this time all of this of course dunston is capable of recruiting the wrongfulness of an otherwise unlawful for the the in International Law a lot of some was involved he defends the prospect that there is one and would praise the defense faces. You know proceeding on demand it is before they kill comes when does not. Have any effect on the colors in his jurisdiction within the limited enough to tell you before of the chicago. As a coffee state he went on seeing that in the end up he from a position of the kill comes in hes 97. The fact that the defense on demand in this pass in a particular. Cut a lot of the confidence of the what i do know or other all of the. Other winds of things would be in a position themselves for all of the phones which would be you know. As has already been seeing you get cases of the kemp of friends of to call the company some of the cones that must have been there on the cover of the new disk submitted 3. Thats 3 days lost on those defenses one demitted his or the other. Which would become irrelevant or moving up the deduced. The call therefore. That becomes the need not when to get the feds but it would mean that he or pick him up at a billeting. Before the appeal counts that that belong to small small greens he and ultimately the relation to the decision could all go for a family that is killing is not enough mischief. They have involved in this. Given before the court. Itself the deputy long to stop me. But is that into detail calls the easy enough miss it is so far as any solution or fun but its clean when necessary if it calls completely up warm up parties of other week does not force this. According to the upper level they decide to use fiction by the cons that would be people with concern for the visas for 2 stiction. All for incompatible with propriety. Policies judicial function but upkeep of the 2 form of. The question for the call is to defend and then whether the decision of the calls to the very depths in the object us had to be laid to death miss you believe your gut that is todays were supporting one. Another or this new all of us who are surfing whether the keys for all before the constant missing. Their call upset but its a difficult top law. Of judicial propriety to the council because he said paramount and the water got responsible to day kill a 7 composed of this in the name of a president that the this of all 4 of the complex things hes elected by the us them. Often give it to us. When the in their personal capacity since ketek fiftys or judicial. Because also know that in addition to a 66 minutes that a few functions specified in article 545552 cover on vacation get counseling was given enough because these 2 for the function offset telling the sigman between 2 or more complex things to be linking to the interpretation or up you kishen of the convention on its own next. This is however does not transform the a. K. L. Confidence into the Judicial Institution in the sense of that. In any event because you dont need to give off because it is dispute settlement function would not be a fit if they counseled examine the issues outside my partys hopes. For the exclusive. Of deciding a dispute which for this within its jurisdiction but up to the 84. 00 of that you covered. Because you very soon by the tail cone. Of issues fall in the towel. Or if you cover or saw the name in order to set the security of the leak including for the creation of all of creation of the convention would no friend. Submit to that argument to you that said given to you in a. Before that. That becomes the good not. When the project if it is but a living go to your projection is so far as the respondent is a step. Up that is truly where you know this. For all these cities and the 2nd. Of the up ellen can not be of help. Us never heard it on the job being. A long piece of self that. When it projected their 2nd but even that object. This is the one to this objection they claim in the calls that lacked superstition because. Failure to meet the negotiation condition following enough to force me to cover conversion. But its up to cation to kill colleagues who was in the miscible because he did not comply with what he called father got off of they killed all the stuff from a different. Decor for example his this to us 15 of. The hopi. With respect to the family you have to meet in negotiation condition to defy you of thought but its up to you kitchen with council the corpse. The. 2 for a few. Sigismund that he said. Is similar to the wording of the complement sort of cloths off a number of other 3. The corps has several such complements that it calls to contain negotiation precondition is that must be. In order to stop it if the court has jurisdiction. This jurisprudence these holes all relevant to the interpretation of it because before. If you cant. Call on see that that article 84. 00 that you cover on then she says its perfectly decent of negotiation that must be met in order to stop the constant tuesday. But. Now that you case that article in the fall if they must make it general when up. With the other concerns the or sphinx. If there were she should have sort of attempted negotiation is to reach a point of a few or wrong before long as the disagreement not be separated by a negotiation and keeping on getting to deduce diction of the constant use such as far. As the court has recognized it gentle enough to negotiate the company may outside of my love have all the problems. Exchanges that take place in an intellectual or going to have all sorts of us and stop that he mourns of international negotiations. In responding to the preliminary objections but i sent him today that. Cited this year or so for many occasions drawn on july 27th. In which he had to. Cause them to take action with respect to their vision for stiction. This communication is. All good their vision of the fiction is to provision in. A village that according to called the. The bills. Of course. That the competent us or. Questionably extend this to question this or fall for fly with me 3030 of complex things to. Him up but that is the bulls if you will. They overthrow that made within the framework or kill related directly to this object about that often it is a given that lead thought was too often. Today calle constant that are given to fall of the chicago. The call is. Made to general enough them within not to kill to set up a negotiation its just to get in with the up as. We got into but it to you cation if you cover all of. Us to the question of whether negotiation is within i kill. The point of a few t. V. Or drop it for. You cation to the council the whole upset that enough of the a. K. L. Calls it is extraordinary session of 51 july 27th. Which was to be held in response to cut his mic with the pedal of his subnet it would complain that it did nicholas and jordan in the discussion but i think over 54. 00 i think she covered vision to the issues of the key to the safety of international that view. At the extraordinary session. Called in for consideration of the vision. Of requests if they are parallel to lift they are. Just looking in before the. There but a sympathy vote the united out of a meeting speaking also on behalf of egypt on so did a. Crisp on the but i defended the legality of the action is arrogant because to limit its deliberations to muck that is believed to would save fuel from the question of. Us this thing from that because the heat on that arctic of 84. In the view of people the statements made today cant come to them on behalf of. Stop or cut but it is said that the uphill of this weapon we to seek the solution of sigman over the vision of distinction is within the councils. And the core of the on scene that is us the us offer to close off the extraordinary session settlement of the disagreement to be a negotiation we did they kill. It he had used to. The core also it came to seem top Cow Development out of my kill. Diplomatic relation is between the pedal up at 7 and 527. Concurrently with the full solution of their view restriction seattle fish others of their pelham as he stated that they will not negotiate with. Recall than to demand that they have that its it public. There is no indication that devotion is up the particles to the vision theres petitions change between the impulse issue over those whose dictions im defining of others of education before they kill constant or think youll call but when 70 under these sort of promised phones the call of policy to that at the moment of the 5 or 5 that is the vacation before they own that they also know that a puppy of a negotiated settlement often sigman between deposit. Into but occasionally on the cation of the Chicago Convention where the before will kill constant or. For the cities on this because you know this. Did not. You know rejected a continuation of. The 215 in the negotiation but a condition of our 52 for the Chicago Convention. To fight. For the future of. Their core then listen to the op ed on this is one thing. Theyre fairly good on before the other is have you cation before the kill cones that was you know this new bill because did not comply with a few kopel sabata good of you or they killed or the system of diffidence. This article provides that theyre not getting in the mere mortal side of this you want to article easy for you to cover for moving he must be on a full in statement that the negotiation is to set the segment he needs between the farm but would not start this this fall and. Of course for the up 11th as this is a procedure of overwhelming thats not near the one thing. In the view of the core to go to all of the killed movements for this or the mental differences to be easy information if youre just joining us on our air weve been watching the International Court of justice delivering its verdict in 2 appeal cases involving qatar and its neighboring countries egypt saudi arabia and the u. A. E. Which appealed to the i. C. J. About the jurisdiction of the International Civil Aviation Organization i. K. O. Council tied find the case i care over the as space blockade imposed by its neighbors 3 years ago lets bring in step by send whos outside the court at the hague any indication so far as to which way the decision of the court will go today step. Well thats a good question fully we have been hearing the president of International Court of justice in the last 30 minutes or so discussing one by one all the objections that the 4 countries to have made to the i. K. O. Ruling in 2018 of favoring qatar saying that the whole air blockade was lawful basically the main point is that you cant go convention from 1944 the president said that the examined at length if this convention is actually a political to the situation of the air blockade and he has said that the definitely is its a very Important International agreement made by many countries at that time and all the parties involved in this dispute have signed this agreement but he also said that. Is not a Judicial Council so if theres a judicial dispute which is outside of their jurisdiction which also these 4 countries have have alleged then of course then the i. K. O. Should not have to jurisdiction but the last word has not been sad about it because another issue that is being discussed by the court is that 4 countries have sat that qatar has applied to this case to the i. K. O. Consul without doing all the necessary negotiations diplomatic a negotiations before hand and the judge here has said that carter did all its best to try to solve the dispute without involvement of the i. K. O. Kong so that actually at the last minute there was also still an effort by qatar to get all the parties on the same space and saying we do you want to lift the blockade now shall we Work Together and that was rejected so it was very clear to the court and the president here that the was on willingness as he has described it to cooperate with scott. On this issue but he has now moved on to the next objections that have been filed by the 4 cancri so its a complicated judicial issue as you may hear and listening in to the president of the criminal court of justice and what were well were going to go back to the court now and listen in once again said thank you very much for the moment here is the president of the International Court of justice once again. Before. Finally all 10 has to defend d it on the 4th he received. In this called take the pill of his that you refer to procedure is the colors that follow in breaching its decision but he didnt say you know a fundamental way that if either men can stop it just will see. They contend that those procedures where the money 1st before all this constituted a fundamental principle of due process of the coincidence known. This call up on the court to exercise it to support vice 30 or 40 top all the decision of the a kill comes to be no voice of the nice. The call of the records in its judgment in the case can set up the billeting to do this fiction of they kill comes in via the suspects. You can find the. Entire proceeding if. They kill bones in that department is just wish us to strew is fiction which is an object the question of fault. In that default false hope said the deposit of the if it were. Not but it is in any fundamental way why the mint itself adults will see. It all had no need to examine whether a decision of the problems that was that he quoted it should nonetheless be on my own because of course each of you read. In the present the core was that i get the hell out of this 2nd that could all stuff up even again is the decision of the council because of policy that. Pulls it but if you put it in that objection this that will put assented to the coliseum in disk of object the question itself will do or also consider that the procedure this followed by the post and did not but it is in any fundamental way that acquirement of it just procedure. For these of these artists get called up all that on the planet or. For calling the or just previous observation because they can for the chicago for invention give is that all of it said a measure of supervision over decision itself problems that it all emphasize that to be best positioned. To go in any future it up even if the decision of the policy frontin is the reason its more flaw that led to de kill constans. For these cities on. The call one. Youre not in one. Project is the other for all by the king that all of. Them out of their public or. You can get them off so we did even in the United Arab Emirates or for the twinkie from the decision of because of the intervention of Civil Aviation organization the 29 when. To. Buy a 50 mm both want. All but the council of the internet and out civil that Vision Organization to his diction to entertain. Submit it to you by the government of the state of. Your club or 27 of the seat of education he submits it. In favor of president yusuf but as president. Judge its. Up. To the donor. Robin sloan or for. You whats our judge or. Against judge or better. Oh all of them do they just. Told me. Of the judgment. Are there we have it the ruling by the International Court of justice tissues age of 14 the verdict is a vast i. K. O. Of the u. N. Aviation body has jurisdiction to entertain the application made by qatar 2 i calle which denounced the made by saudi arabia the u. A. E. And bahrain i had made a case to i. K. O. Which the board locating countries had then appealed today the International Court of justice we. Mislead the appeals made by saudi arabia the u. A. E. And bahrain and voting by 15. 00 to 1. 00 that i k o does indeed have jurisdiction to entertain this case and lets bring in step boss and outside the court at the hague this was a complicated case 2 appeals made by the locating countries and the decision goes against them today. Exactly its a very clear win for qatar in this case i have to say the appeal was completely rejected as the president of the court just said and also the order the 2nd part that is a has indeed jurisdiction was floated in the 15 in favor of the judges and one only again so its a very clear ruling that the appeal of the 4 countries was rejected on all grounds basically they the goggle convention which qatar has used to to make sure that this will be lifted is exactly the convention that should be used according to the president because this is a convention signed in 1944 by most nations all the parties involved have signed this convention and it says that there is this freedom of movement between countries airspace can be entered by another country there is this freedom so thats exactly what the president has decided and also the appeal was also focusing on the lack of negotiations as the 4 countries had accused qatar of they said qatar should have made more effort to solve the conflict before going to the i. K. O. Council now that the president also said that that was the case that did its utmost best to negotiate and it was simply impossible to reach an agreement so this is a very clear ruling its also by inning right its a binding ruling theres no appeal possibility here at this Call International so as the states mostly comply right theres no interest just yet so that our viewers understand whats going on here no appeal at the International Court of justice but this doesnt mean the case is over because now its going back to i. K. O. The u. N. Aviation body in montreal. Exactly how its now did your restriction to deal with the case and so the ball is back with. Well they have already used this she got the convention so of course there are some very positive signs for qatar now but its also a big question how do the other countries the 4 states will comply with this ruling because they can also make all kinds of restrictions again on this on this ruling so its still not the end of this blockade but its definitely a positive outcome for qatar thank you for that said life for us not to the International Court of justice at the hague lets bring in hashem had a bar and who is here in doha with us youve covered this crisis for a sense to beginning a victory today for qatar remind our viewers about what this dispute centers around and what this decision today by the International Court of justice means Going Forward were basically if youre asking about any reaction from the qatari officials theyre saying basically this is a Pivotal Moment and major victory for us and the reason why they are euphoric about the ruling today of the International Court of justice is that they are going to be armed with more legal arsenal to move forward and say its time to and not only the blockade but all the work it has been imposed by the blockades in countries saudi arabia the u. A. E. Behind and egypt in 2017 they are going to go back to the International Civil Aviation Authority and they do know that the general sentiment among the United Nations Civil Aviation agency is this is completely wrong illegal it must it must come to an end you never know they might go to the United Nations General Assembly in the near future and say you know what we have the ruling of the ice e. G. We have the backing of the Legal Community we have the backing of the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Therefore its about time to put more pressure on the blockade in country have to remind our viewers that the same court the ice e. G. Train has ruled in favor of cuts in the past discrimination case against the United Arab Emirates right it is not the 1st legal case that the i. C. J. Has ruled on in this dispute they also ordered as you say cattery families to be reunited this qatari strategy hashim after stewing in legal avenues is it having an effect i mean whether its positive or negative is it having an effect on the wider g. C. C. Crisis and you know the efforts to resolve it well remember we were together talking about the same crisis in 2 in june 2017 that moment the bookit in countries were hoping that by the severing diplomatic ties imposing of the blockade there will further isolate discredit qatar and force the qatari government to accept a list of 13 demands which the qatari government says is a breach of its own sovereignty so the qataris so the Political Landscape of that particular moment they went to the International Community saying we need to stop the blockade but at the same time they pursued a parallel path which is basically going to the legal authorities the i c g they went to the United Nations also Human Rights Committee and they got more backing from those platforms about what happened on june the 5th 2071 when you look at the Bigger Picture which is the g. C. C. Crisis there is absolutely no indication that were going to see an immediate and to the crisis but the qatari government with this ruling today is optimistic that he has more arsenal more. To move forward. With a bucket of the ice e. G. Its about time for the broker to countries to lift the blockade they want to go back to the status quo before june the 5th 2017 all right thank you for that hashem lets get the views now of our senior political analysts Marwan Bashara marwan as weve been hearing a victory for qatar it might be a step closer to regaining access to a to air space but i knew that there were so a long way to go as far as resolving the bigger crisis the g. C. C. Crisis. Yes and theres a long way to go in a spot as this very particular rule it lets all remember that even when the international. Court of justice rules and takes up a very clear position say for example on the israeli war all about a sign that was what like a dozen and a half years ago and of course Nothing Happened it wasnt meant that it was taken as an advisor and i think here we have once again a link that what all be taken out of that advisement its very important symbolically its important legally its even important. Im not sure how its going to be enforced other than that i can you know going back and. Insisting on what the 2 of the ready which is we all knew but dont want to think countries were wrong about what theyve been caught up and certainly begin the Civil Aviation into i made sure that everyone understands now was born deception reception and support mention of that on the what it did and it did not do so i think for the time being we probably should be a bit more sober about the implications of this sorting meaning the us that be a mix of a you he and so if you want to expose once again to what we are to mix and im a few see your style beginnings what it once again exposed but i think we are still very far from ensuring that this accumulation or credit may go for the upholstered. By. Will lead to others that you should at the point that the go i and as you same point to point out that this is you know its going to be hard for i. K. O. To to implement this and to get the locating countries to abide by any voting because it had previously made a recommendation that all sates must idea to sign treaties but that hasnt happened as far as the political diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis where do things stand the americans the Top Administration has been very keen it seems in recent months to see this dispute resolved but there again not much progress made. Well terry i was i was quite taken by that longer report by fox news you know the. Preferred term of the american president taking a shot. d at the u. A. E. And saudi arabia and really blaming them. For blocking if you will for undermining trumps effort to resolve the gulf crisis so from the fox news little before at the end which by the way even talked about the Civil Aviation aspect of it saying that qatar pays according to fox news 133000000. 00 a year to iran in order to get this access to its airspace anyway it just we have this understanding now in washington that the u. A. E. Is and so and so in the arabian bahrain were walking a significant to the gulf crisis line but apparently washington wants washington needs wants and did insist on but they usually answer if youre going to continue to undermine american diplomacy and gulf unity because its insists on imposing its on dictates against which have for the last 3 years failed and apparently would continue to fear judging from todays hulet. Briefly marwan theyve been reports that is to us the iraqis in particular whove been blocking f. A c. This crisis be solved why is that. You know ive always had this very cliche that i always repeated the last 2 years its only very hard to come down you know of the tree but to come down a palm tree is even harder and in the gulf area now theres lots of parliament and climbing down. For the u. A. E. And saudi arabia bahrain has been quite tough its just been to find a difficult to back track because they were hoping that their maneuver back in what up work to undermine the ira to basically impose their will on it when since that failed this implicate not swallow their defeat they could not swallow the fact that their conspiracy against that never did not work out and that even the American Partners have walked away from that and hence i think they just find it difficult to give up and say look we failed were sorry lets go back to the. Plea. To the. Our situations are ok well leave it there for now well have plenty more on this story coming up on aljazeera after this very short break just. In the off to mark of the 2011 quake and tsunami a remarkable portrayed of a remote japanese village. Idiots later how has the community of me arko been able to move on and rebuild their lives. Rewinds japan aftermath of the catastrophe. On aljazeera. These men are survivors of coping 1946 year old is a limousine driver is the only one here who needed to go to hospital when he became bill in early march it will be. Boarded will be so bad that its already november so deep it is a 34 year old driver for kotori family and he tested positive like what is good it will all be small but will you all be Health Officials say the rate of new infections has slowed the goal here is to conduct a broad serving to better understand transmission and asymptomatic cases which in turn could help policy decisions in the future so it would be easy for us to inform the a Decision Making on what to do next the goal now is to increase testing and contact trees that. The government provides free testing and medical treatment for those who need it while campaigns to raise awareness continue. The politics of division have pushed india into the grip of historical reckoning i am afraid because i know all the minorities in india afraid where do these ideas come from the tragedy of morning news home want to try to send the closest were going to be it was going to be a happy family before the reporter joining me opticians us here on the. Final part of my journey to become a target of the hindu 1st policy in search of india saw an aljazeera. Qatar is calling it a major victory the uns top court ruled that its Aviation Branch will settle an as phase dispute that has seen caught up prevent in prevented from flying over for our nations. Player watching aljazeera live from doha with me fully back t. Bo also coming out the u. K. Government bans the purchase of new 5 g. Equipment from chinese tech giant huawei washington rejects beijings claims in the South China Sea china in turn accuses the u. S. Of on