But is it really all change, or simply as you were . President mugabe, do you still like him or do you not like him . Crowd chants n0. We dont like mugabe. Since long, you were afraid because if you were saying something negative about him, you would be butchered. Hello. The weather may be getting colder, but the Brexit Process is hotting up. A European Council meeting in two weeks will decide whether britain gets to the next level in the talks. That is, whether we get to discuss trade and ourfuture relationship. Weve made concessions on the money issue. Fair to say thats no impediment to moving on now. But there is still the not insignificant issue of the irish border. Its a circle to be squared. The uk does not want to be in the Customs Union or the Single Market but that would normally imply we have border with those who are. The land border between Northern Ireland and the republic included. Everybody agrees that a border is not a good idea there but no one has really suggested how you avoid it in a way that is acceptable to everyone else. Well hear from the irish agriculture secretary shortly, but first our diplomatic editor, mark urban reports from the invisible border itself. This is how the modern lumber business is done. Load trees in one end. Get planks out of the other. The transformation takes just 12 minutes. It all runs with such sharp efficiency that the mill works day and night 365 days a year. This plant near enniskillen in Northern Ireland, uses mainly logs from the republic, put a hard border in the way of that, and all its precisely calculated margins would go awry. Now we have 23,000 cross border commercial lorry movements every year and you can imagine how much time would be lost if we started to lose an hour or a half hour of time on those. We have 300 direct employees here in enniskillen. Maybe another 300 indirect. If we lost an hour a day, or an hour on each Truck Movement that would equate to 15 new people and the efficiency of the business would be badly impaired. Years of tranquillity and political progress here mean that in many places the border is barely discernible. So were on the road here to clones in County Fermanagh and this road actually passes the border four times in the space of ten minutes. This type of ease of traffic is the thing that is being threatened by current developments. So back in the troubles, the army closed many Border Crossing points and people who want the border to carry on working in this very unrestricted way say that if measures are put in place to control it again, whether that is a controlled cameras or customs officers, those could easily become the focus for protest or even violence, by those opposed to any tightening of control. But with the eu heading for a summit, where two out of the three of its brexit separation issues, money and Citizens Rights appeared to be close to resolution, the irish border question has suddenly gained great power. This is the first time in the history of anglo irish relations, when you have had conflict between britain and ireland, when ireland has been the stronger position. It has never happened before. It is very unfamiliar territory for us to be in. And it is a huge challenge for ireland, because we are not used to having that kind of power in ourside of anglo irish relations. And we have to use it really, really well. We have a fairly short period in which it can be used, and if it is used badly, it is a disaster for ireland, but also for britain, and that is no good for any of us. And if ireland takes too strong a line, and contributes to a disorderly brexit, one without an agreement, its economy would suffer terribly. Any sector or any company which has supplied chains which span the north and south, so there are a lot of complications for firms which they are beginning to grapple with, and beginning to look at in a more granular sense as they prepare for brexit, but these will have real impact on companies, and potentially would be very disruptive. In dublin, politicians want maximum concessions for business, while keeping peace in the form of the good friday agreement in tact. But if their favoured solution, retaining Northern Ireland as part of the eus Customs Union is to take flight, loyalists in the north will have to be convinced that that is not pushing them towards a united ireland. The constitutional position can only be changed if there is a referendum and a united ireland, and that is contained in the good friday agreement. We are campaigning for that and we want to see that referendum and win that referendum. This is a practical measure. What can the uk say, short of keeping the north in the Customs Union, to convince ireland it should allow brexit talks to move on . We have not had sufficient detail from the uk government will stop when it comes to the border, we had a fine speech from the Prime Minister in florence and a lengthy paper but neither of which had any decent level of detail for the Irish Government to put out a proposal in relation to a new Customs Union. We want to make sure we have something similar or advanced from the uk government. Back in fermanagh, what they want is a minimum of disruption to their supply chain, and a special status for the north that might not be called Customs Union, but could look remarkably similar to it. Solving the border issue will require some sort of special regime that is not such an example of irish exceptionalism that it falls foul of the bureaucrats in brussels. Ireland is using its window of opportunity to press the uk for answers, but with wider eu uk agreement apparently close, the pressure is being felt on both sides of the irish border, for a workable road map to solve their issues. Nick watt our Political Editor is here. Nick, it has been a busy couple of days with the money thing yesterday, Northern Ireland a lot of things to say there. Lets start on the money. Are we clear about where the deal is and what was promised . Yes, we said last night that the uk and eu have reached agreement on a framework, but if there is a written agreement you will not see of money written down, you wont see a sum of money written down. But i understand that if we get to that agreement, in the run up to or at the European Council next month, the two sides will agree a figure. It will not be in writing and that figure will emerge. The uk view is that that figure will be between a0 to £16 billion, with an absolute cap that it cannot go above £16 billion, and that is a0 billion of money that is absolutely related to the eu, and what im told is a couple of extra billion in money that is not wholly definitively related to the eu but will essentially go into that pot. That is pounds. A lot of things we were talking yesterday was in euros so billion euros. Northern ireland. Does the uk government believes it can see a way through . The uk government believes this is the most serious issue. One source said they hoped to get there by the time of the summit but it is a gamble. I understand uk is planning a carrot and stick approach with dublin. The stickers to say you claim that we are not abiding by the principles of the good friday agreement. The stick is to say. Actually, you are not abiding by it because what youre doing is slowly representing the nationalist community, which has real fears about brexit. Solely representing the nationalist community. At the heart of the good friday agreement is you need to take both communities with you, and unionists obviously voted mainly in favour of leave in the referendum. That is the stick. The carrot is to say lets take the cooperation across the island of ireland that is in the good friday agreement, lets entrench them in this agreement with the eu and two areas such as agriculture and the Single Energy market. What uk ministers will say is we reckon we could sell that to the dup. The dup, until earlier this year, was in government with sinn fein governing an all ireland issues. We can sell that to them. What we cannot sell is putting a border between Northern Ireland and Great Britain down the irish sea. Nick, thank you. We hear a lot of the british view but earlier this evening, i spoke to michael creed, the irish agriculture secretary. I started by asking him how the irish border issue could be resolved in brexit talks. Well, we have articulated what we believe is a reasonable position to resolve the issue. The uk has clearly set its face against that. 0ur suggestion was Northern Ireland should remain within the Customs Union and the Single Market. We know. What is clearly incumbent on theresa may and her government, and her negotiating team, is to articulate and alternative which does not give rise to hard border, because everybodys agreed, we do not want a hard border. Notjust for trade reasons, but because of the long lessons of history that we have learned to our great cost, notjust financially but indeed at higher cost, over many, many years. The good friday agreement, the Single Market and the Customs Union have facilitated a seamless border over many years. If the uk government has clearly said no to a Single Market and Customs Union, it is clearly incumbent on the British Government to articulate a way forward that enables us to have an invisible seamless border which they said they want. Let me put this to you. Suppose the british said we have a solution but it relies on checking one in 100 trucks as they go across the border, would that be acceptable to the Irish Government . Well, you and i are not going to negotiate the detail of it. There are teams of negotiators on behalf of the uk government and the bynea negotiating teams. It is not a Bilateral Agreement between the republic of ireland and the uk, it is between the uk and the 27 member states. The 27 are rock solid. We need Political Solutions now and were not getting their solutions. What if there was a big lorry parked inside Northern Ireland where some checks were made, does that constitute a physical border is unacceptable or is that compatible with the kind of no border rhetoric we are hearing . That is not compatible with an invisible seamless border. But it is an interesting premise to your question. The uk citizens, and i respect their vote, but voted to leave the eu but they did not in this city vote in the mentation of that decision to vote to leave the Customs Union or the Single Market. That is an entirely different interpretation of the issue. My concern is, with all of the historical connotations of the border, if they were to re emerge, that is something which is violently destructive to the citizens of Northern Ireland, and that is why, also in the context of trade, anything that is an impediment to trade, no matter what political hack the web, is to the detriment of citizens north and south. Would your Prime Minister leo varadkar survived if he made significant concessions on the position you were describing . It is not a strong government in the republic at the moment. Would he survive, would he be able to command majority support if he made concessions . I do not propose to speak for other parties but i am certain there is 100 agreement across the political divide on the issue of the border between the republic and Northern Ireland. This is a really, really critical issue. It is far, far more important than the trade context between north and south on the island of ireland. It has to do with the difficult historical lessons we have learnt, which have been born out of a hard border, and we certainly want to avoid that, and that is our primary motivation. Obviously, trade issues that arise and costs associated with the border are important, but they are secondary to the lessons of history. Thank you. So, if you didnt see the news, Donald Trumps morning twitter flow included three retweets each an anti muslim video posted by the deputy leader of the far right Group Britain first. For example, one purported to show a muslim migrant beating up a dutch boy on crutches. The reaction to trump sending out hate videos was immediate yvette cooper, chair of the Home Affairs Committee was typical. She said, couldnt have imagined there was anything left trump could do to shock me. But promoting the views of a woman from a far right hate group is appalling. It raises an interesting question for progressives or mainstream politicians, how should you react to trump on a day like this . A question for us too. A day when a president breeches the norms that most citizens respect. Heres the dilemma. If trump or anyone wants to get attention by doing things that annoy you, you dont want to reward their undesirable behaviour. So strategy number one is not to reward it. Avoid being shocked by President Trump, by not being shocked. Dont rise to the bait. The problem is, that a consequence of that is that then the abnormal can become normalised. If anti Muslim Videos are not your thing, especially those posted by britain firsts jayda fransen, then to passively watch a us president post them as though thats an everyday occurrence, implies that is an everyday occurrence. But it isnt. So if you dont want it be normalised, strategy two, is to be shocked by trump tweets. Like labour mp chris bryant who suggested trump be arrested if he comes to the uk, for inciting racial hatred. The problem with expressing outrage, is that one suspects it is what President Trump wants. And its certainly what jayda fra nsen wants. So is there a third way for those who find the whole hate thing distasteful . Neither rewarding it, nor ignoring it . I can think of only one. You react not with hate or division, but with love and understanding. You dont get angry you follow the simplest advice of the dalai lama, be kind whenever possible. It is always possible he said. To muslims. And to trump supporters. Is there anything else to be done . You may have your own ideas but im joined by the conservative mp Nadhim Zahawi was born in iraq, and has previously spoken out against trumps travel ban on majority muslim countries. You have reacted in your own way, by writing a letter to him. I have written to him tonight to explain to him why i think he is wrong for re tweeting those videos. Why many people in his administration, as well as ours, who work on counterterrorism, would be heartbroken because our work involves effectively combating the ideology of diversion or alqaeda any hate group, far right or any radical group. By effectively going the other way, by saying, what they are trying to do is dehumanise our values, to brainwash young men to blow themselves up. To participate in the same thing and dehumanise muslims, i would want him to think again, delete those videos. I want him to come here so i can take him to Stratford Upon Avon and birmingham and london. And i have invited him, to try to educate him to the diversity, integration and how beautiful, as he would put it, our society is. I think he really needs to think hard tonight about his behaviour. Do you think he has not thought about this does not know what you are saying . 0r needs to visit the uk to know that spreading hate is not a good way of fostering Community Relations . I wonder whether rationalising with the man is never going to work . I would like to think that he is probably naive to the fact that a lot of resources in the united states, Human Resources and financial, is going into combating this narrative, notjust physically in iraq, the Prime Minister was in baghdad today, where we are taking on diversion militarily but the ideology is more important and to effectively dehumanise in the way they do, or that we, as he has done, is counter productive and when he speaks to the secretary, his secretaries, he will know this. I would like to know the reply. What reaction does you want when he tweets this stuff . What reaction is he trying to get . To annoy, to distract from other things, attention . People who create these videos do it they try to target emotional heartstrings that are about hatred. It is a basic knee jerk reaction. Tribal . It is what terrorists use. They show videos of our society and they dehumanise it so that young men can be brainwashed and once you do that, you can do anything to a human being. That is what the nazis did to thejews. I think, dare i say it, he has naively bought into that narrative. Finally, we call britain first a far right group, should be call him a far right president . I dont think so, sometimes when he thinks about these things, he does say that he is the least racist human being and i would like to believe that, i would like him to come here and see how integrated, how peaceful and tolerant, we coexist, it is a wonderful place in england. And i need him to be here to see this because he is the holder of the office and the Prime Minister needs to work with the president and he happens to be that president so we have to go the extra mile to educate him. Thank you for coming in and we would like to see his reply. Two weeks and one day ago, the Zimbabwean Army moved into harare. We reported the armoured vehicle movements that day, perplexed as to what was going on. Was it a coup . Well, the question, was it a coup was never quite answered unambiguously. Certainly, president Robert Mugabe was soon out of office, but if it was a coup, it was unusual in that the army did itsjob peacefully, then went away again without installing one of its generals into the president ial palace. Gabriel gatehouse has been in zimbabwe for the last few days piecing together what exactly happened over the few days running up to president mugabes departure from office. And, working out whether there are grounds for optimism at the man who replaced him. It was tuesday the 14th of november. Ignatius chombo, zimbabwes finance minister, had gone to bed early at his home in the affluent suburbs of harare. Some time after midnight, masked men, armed and wearing military fatigues, burst in and took him away. Now hes in hospital, purged from the party and under arrest. Weve come to see if he can tell us his story. Thank you very much. Mr chombo was on a bed behind a screen under armed guard. There are three soldiers in there saying get out. The following day, he appeared in court charged with corruption. But mr chombos real difficulty now is his association with zimbabwes former first lady. Weve been hearing some really quite dramatic details about the arrests of supporters of grace mugabe on the night of the 14th of november. Events, really, that became the starting gun for the coup that overthrew Robert Mugabe. As night fell, the cameras assembled to catch a glimpse of one of zimbabwes most powerful men, humbled and shackled. Herded into a prison van along with common criminals. As this country embarks upon a new era, some habits, it seems, die hard. They bombed the gate to his house and entered through the roof, some of them. Others, they broke the doors, broke every door in the house until they finally came to where he was with his wife. They were all asked to lie down. They were then blindfolded and he was taken out of the house. Taken to a place where he could not tell what place it was and at the end of the day, he was there for more than seven days. Blindfolded throughout the entire period of his incarceration. Father Fidelis Mukonori is sometimes called mugabes confessor. The events went very fast. I was phoned by the permanent secretary in the ministry of information. He said, father, you know, somethings happened in the early hours of this morning. Ajesuit priest and close personal friend of many years, when the generals made their move, they asked fr fidelis to mediate. The tanks were in the street, the boys were on the street. And his generals were sombre, sombre as anything. There was no sign ofjitteriness or overexcitement or anger. No. Did it strike you as well planned . Yes, well planned. The generals had drawn up a list of demands which centred around the reinstatement of the exiled Vice President , Emmerson Mnangagwa. The main one was, we will not accept the legacy of zimbabwe, the legacy of Robert Mugabe, to be drained out or to be fizzled out by opportunists. After finishing the meeting with the commanders, i drove to president mugabes residence. The blue roof. And we read the points, one by one. What was his reaction . Robert mugabe is a guerilla, a fighter and a leader. He never loses his calmness. Not everyone who was at that first meeting remembers things going quite that smoothly. Two people with knowledge of the conversation that day told us that Robert Mugabe said to the generals, you can go to hell you can kill me if you want to. And perhaps, after 37 years in power, thats a more plausible reaction. But Robert Mugabe is the embodiment of power in zimbabwe. And the aim is to control that legacy, not to kill it. Its a delicate operation and its not over yet. The removal of mugabe from the presidency brought euphoria onto the streets of harare. How do you feel right now . Fantastic. This is a new zimbabwe. The inauguration of the new president last friday seemed like a moment of great promise. And yet, the figure of Robert Mugabe retains some respect for his role in the liberation struggle. Despite a record of political violence, endemic corruption and unemployment. The people, they are desperate. That is why most of us have supported Emmerson Mnangagwa, because of jobs. We arejobless. Most of these people, they actually hold degrees, masters, phds. But were sitting at home with nothing to do. Can i ask you, how do you all feel about president mugabe . Do you still like him or do you not like him . They chant n0. Since long, we didnt like him but we were afraid because if you were saying something negative about him, you would be butchered. But this was no revolution. The soldiers on the streets heralded an internal battle within zanu pf, the ruling party. Mnangagwa and the military had gained the upper hand. Grace mugabe and her supporters were losing their grip. Walter mzembi is among the latter group. He was appointed foreign minister just before the coup and was a close confidant of the mugabes. When the tanks appeared on the street, his first thought was for his own safety. Nice place you have here. Modest i was in my bedroom, upstairs. I heard gunshots. Of course, i said, this cant be right, whatever it is. You dont wait for yourself to be captured, i suspect that is what it is. You dont wait for it to happen. I obviously sought sanctuary. Where did you go . Ijust went into a hotel. Looking back, mr mzembi says he should have known that trouble was coming. Sometimes, the military were giving us a warning. What kind of warning . That if we insisted and continued to act the way we are doing in the party, that would be the end of him. They gave you warnings . In hindsight. You realise they were warnings. They were warning us. We never took them seriously that was a mistake. Grace mugabe had made many enemies using her power as first lady to publicly chastise Party Stalwarts and veterans of the liberation struggle. Well, she would correct even some of us in public. And there was absolutely nothing that i was felt was wrong. In our culture, if you are corrected by a mother. Except when it tends to border on abuse. But as she corrected me. Is that what happened . I think she behaved like a of mother would punish children in public, i think. That is what incensed others, yes. Now the tables had turned. From exile in south africa, Emmerson Mnangagwa sent a message to fr fidelis. He wanted to speak to mugabe. So, i called him on my phone and i said, im sitting next to the president. He also wants to speak to you. So the two spoke for exactly ten minutes. Mnangagwa had accused grace of trying to poison him. Now he told his former boss. He said i had to leave the country for fear of my life. And thats why i left the country. You want me to come . I love zimbabwe. Would you like to deal with the issue . Indeed, i will come. So the president said, please, please, come, come, come right away. And that was the last words. That was on the friday. By the weekend, people were coming out onto the streets, calling openly from Robert Mugabe to go. These were scenes unthinkable just a few days earlier. On sunday, mugabe addressed the nation. Everyone expected him to resign, but still he clung on. Some people close to Robert Mugabe said that by this time, he had already accepted that Emmerson Mnangagwa would be his successor, but he wanted to hand over to him personally, at the Party Congress in december. 0thers, though, say that he was still haggling over the terms and conditions of his retirement. Immunity from prosecution, the security of his and his wifes businesses and properties. Even a lump sum in cash. Whatever the truth, by the following tuesday, the 21st, parliament had begun impeachment proceedings and the game was up. I pretty much was taken by surprise when i heard that he had capitulated and tendered his resignation. But i thought that happened under a break of pressure that was coming from the impeachment process in parliament. What do you think it was that finally made him capitulate . He was betrayed by his colleagues. By their last minute switch. But that is politics mr mzembi himself backed mugabe to the last. Now he supports the new president his loyalty, he says, is to the office. A short drive out of harare, through countryside of Rolling Hills and gold mines, brings you to mazowe. It was where grace mugabe built her base, centred around a sprawling mansion behind stone pillars. This is known as graceland. Many local people were pushed off their farms by the former first lady. Those who remain are still uneasy. How has it been to be the neighbour of grace mugabe . Mmmmm . A few people are still scared to talk. For the past three and a half decades, this country has been held together by fear. Few expect that to change quickly. People said to me, a week ago, i couldnt have come out on the street and said what i am saying now. One person said to me, i would have been. I mean, that gives you some indication of the kind of regime that people have been living under, that you were also part of . Well, i didnt get the sense that there was an infringement of Civil Liberties in this country. You dont think Robert Mugabe ran a repressive regime . To demonstrate without a police order, im not sure it attracted the attention of the police at the time. And i dont think even this successor administration would authorise expression of freedom that led to unauthorised demonstrations. Do you think there will be a change . They may have a false sense of freedom if they think that they can be out on the streets to demonstrate without police sanction. For decades, Robert Mugabe outsmarted his enemies, foreign and domestic. Now, the combination of political acumen and intimidation that kept him in powerfor so long finally failed him. Fr fidelis was there when he was presented with his resignation papers. He read them and he took his pen and signed. And when he finished his signing, his face just. Calmed. It just glowed. As if to say, wow, its over. So, what happens now . The soldiers have largely returned to their barracks. Life has almost returned to normal. After 37 years of rule dominated by one man and one party, the overwhelming imperative for the new regime is continuity, not change. The murders of lin and Megan Russell in chillenden in kent back in 1996 shook the nation at the time. The mother and daughter were bludgeoned to death while walking their dog. Megans sister was left for dead, but amazingly survived the attack. A year later, kent police thought theyd found the killer, a man called Michael Stone. A drug user and criminal, he was convicted for the murders in 1998, on the basis not of forensic evidence, but alleged confessions he had made to other prisoners. He always denied the killings but even in a retrial, his conviction upheld. However, mr stones legal team claim to have new evidence that suggests it was, in fact, the known murderer Levi Bellfield who actually killed the russells. They have presented their evidence to the criminal Case Review Commission and now hope that Michael Stone will soon be free. They describe it as potentially the largest miscarriage ofjustice since the birmingham six case. Im joined by Barbara Stone michaels sister who has always asserted his innocence. And Mark Mcdonald is Michael Stones barrister. Good evening to you. Barbara, why have you always felt so sure that he was not the murderer . Because i have never seen any evidence or anything that would suggest that he was. I think the only reason that people think he was the murderer is because the police said that he did it. But there is no evidence and i have never seen anything. He had committed other crimes that they were not like this . He did, but they were a different kind. I always say he did the crime and he did the time. I would not approve of all his lifestyle choices but this is very different to this, the murder of women and children. That is not something any of us would tribute to him. Also around that time, there were no behaviours that would indicate that he had done that. Mark, you have cited three pieces of evidence which would point potentially to Levi Bellfield. A witness, some forensics evidence and some prison confessions on his part. The amazing thing is, for at least two of those, that so long after the murders, the evidence comes out now and people would find that perplexing . First of all, with Levi Bellfield, the trigger was a documentary that ran in may of this year, and that was a trigger for discussion that took place because bellfield was worried that the documentary may Say Something prejudicial about him. That started a conversation happening thereafter, a series of conversations which were part of the confession. And as i understand it, his confession, his alleged confession had elements in it that he would not have known by reading newspaper accounts of the original murderer . And that is important. When you look at the confession or the alleged confession that convicted Michael Stone, nothing in that confession, there was nothing, everything was in the public domain. But it comes to. From what you are citing . From Levi Bellfield, there are a number of aspects that only the person who committed the crime would know. Just briefly, is prison cell evidence, is that good evidence . It is ironic because Michael Stone was convicted that and now youre citing some of that in relation . Cell confession evidence is a problem and in particular cell confession evidence from somebody who is on remand which is what convicted Michael Stone in the first place, has huge problems attached to it. What is important is to look at the other evidence, the corroborative evidence to go with that. So, for example, with damien daley, the witness who convicted Michael Stone in the first trial, it was clear that everything was in the public domain, nothing new was in that, whereas with Levi Bellfield, there was a lot. Barbara, how is Michael Stone now . It must be a roller coaster of Emotional Turmoil hearing that the evidence has come out and then suddenly finding out you do not know if it will have any hope or not. How is he . Mick is very confident. I speak to him almost daily. He is very confident about the potential evidence. He is convinced bellfield is the guilty party. We would not go that far at the moment but my brother is convinced that he did it. That is because mick would know that he didnt. In order to get out of prison, he is happy about that. Kent police are not particularly keen on reopening this case and we have a long statement. It is unfair on the victims to reopen the investigation. It is important though, you want a Different Police force to come in and examine this . We do. That have been problems over the years with the kent police force, actually going right back to the first trial, the way that they obtained evidence, and thereafter that have been a number of issues, including missing on losing an important exhibit. So, yes we do. Their Statement Today is quite bizarre. So we do have concerns. It goes back many years. Where we are now, this is with the criminal cases review commission. The criminal cases review commission need to look at this. I know they are investigating it, but it is clear that the evidence is quite compelling and it needs to be referred back to the court of appeal soon enough. Thank you both for coming in. That is all we have time for. Tomorrow, kamal ahmed will be here. Good night. Time for your latest live update from bbc weather. With a frost setting in over much of the uk at the moment, wintry showers going into northern scotland. Sleet and snow for many of us. Rain showers overnight in Northern Ireland. Icy patches where we have showers overnight with widespread frost at 6 overnight with widespread frost at 6 and 7 possible across rural spots as we go across thursday morning. The cold is enhanced by the wind. Further wintry showers around three north and northeast scotland, mainly rain showers into Northern Ireland, afairamount mainly rain showers into Northern Ireland, a fair amount of cloud. Down north sea coasts of england, rain and sleet. There will be sleet and snow. Temporary accumulations to lower levels in a few spots on thursday. Rain showers continue to move through mainly pembrokeshire and cornwall through the day. Many places across southern england, midlands, will have a dry day with plenty of sunshine. It will be a cold day wherever you are, regardless of whether you get the blue sky or the showers to start the day and end the day, you are in the same place. The strongest winds are in north sea coasts. It feels more like this in the afternoon. Perhaps Gale Force Winds across the north coast. With the change of wind direction, although showers fell to inland over friday morning. Again, giving some light accumulation in places and turning things icy as well. The showers turned back to rain on friday and more of us see the sunshine at increasing cloud for Northern Ireland and scotland on friday. Patchy rain and hill snow starting to move in with this. The first sign of a change coming our way for the weekend. This weather front way for the weekend. This weather fro nt m oves way for the weekend. This weather front moves through and it is the atla ntic front moves through and it is the atlantic direction rather than arctic so we bring in less call there over the weekend. It will start to feel a little bit different but where we are getting plenty of sunshine now, over the weekend there will be plenty of cloud. A bit of a change on the way. The feel of the weather. And the look of the weather. And the look of the weather. There is that process taking place over the weekend. More of us getting into double figures by the time we get to sunday with plenty of cloud. Still an amount of dry weather. Warnings for snow and ice on our website. Im rico hizon in singapore. The headlines britain rebukes donald trump for sharing inflammatory, anti Muslim Videos posted online by the far right Group Britain first. Look, again, whether its a real video, the threat is real, and that is what the president is talking about. After north koreas latest missile test, the Us Ambassador to the un issues another blunt warning to kim jong un. If war comes, make no mistake. The north korean regime will be utterly destroyed. Im ben bland in london. Also in the programme a convicted bosnian war criminal kills himself by drinking poison in court, after his sentence is upheld