vimarsana.com

Card image cap

Hello, this is bbc news with martine croxall. Well be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment. First, the headlines. Tonight, thomas cook teeters on the brink of collapse planes are on standby to bring home stranded tourists amid fears the company could fold within hours. Your heart sinks. You have planned everything, every minute detail, and then all of a sudden everything can come apart at the last moment. Labour insists it can win a general election, as arguments rumble beneath the surface over the partys brexit stance. The signs of global heating are speeding up, according to the latest science on climate change, published ahead of key un talks in new york. And in 15 minutes, find out if Jason Solomons thinks brad pitts new astronaut film is out of this world that and more coming up in the film review. Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With me are parliamentaryjournalist tony grew and entertainment journalist caroline frost. Many of tomorrows front pages are already in. The telegraph leads with the future of labour, after its shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry warned the party could lose almost a third of its membership if it did not adopt a remain stance over brexit. The i says mr corbyn is preparing to go to battle against his own mps and Party Activists on the issue. The front page of the times also looks at the Party Conference, but focuses on labours plans to abolish private schools. The daily mail leads on thomas cook, and says it could take up to two weeks for the government to re patriate 165,000 of the compa nys customers who are abroad. The Financial Times also features that story, and says the total compensation bill could exceed £600 million. And the mirror says labour is announcing plans to compensate veterans who were victims of nuclear testing. We will begin with the times. Independent schools will be abolished by labour, caroline. The party has voted to end hierarchy and elitism, as they see it. Quite a shakeup. Can you imagine if this we re shakeup. Can you imagine if this were to actually follow through, the enormous shakeup, not just for schools but for Adult Society and for university and for basically the class ruled society as we know it . The idea being that, at the moment, they want to change it so the number of privately educated students into universities will be far more in line with the rationale of how many private schools there are across the country. So the net result would be that the number of private school stu d e nts that the number of private School Students admitted to university would be savagely reduced, so you would be savagely reduced, so you would see far, far less. Which i guess would remove a huge incentive for many parents to send their children to private schools. What happened to freedom of choice . children to private schools. What happened to freedom of choice . I was just thinking, a general election is imminent, there is almost certainly going to be a general election before the next time labour has its co nfe re nce before the next time labour has its conference in 2020, and i look at this and think. What are you talking about . What cohort of voters have you identified who think this is going to be a massive vote winner for your party . This is ideology of the practicality in terms of politics. Labour should be flinging out all of these consumer friendly policies like that, that is what they should be talking about. Anti austerity things. Yes, and better offer about things they care about, such as the school the child goes to. To me this isjust endemic of how far labour have fallen into their own fundament, just how far they are obsessed with their own ideas about class war. About, you know, notions of equality that are based on ideas that are quite possibly illegal. 0ne based on ideas that are quite possibly illegal. One of the interesting things here, john mcdonnell, who is the shadow chancellor, and has been an early champion of the abolished eaton campaign, says that seizing schools assets could be illegal and he wouldnt do it. The activist behind the idea insisted on including it anyway. That tells you everything you need to know. Private schools have raised the prospect of a legal challenge. I agree, i find it have raised the prospect of a legal challenge. I agree, ifind it really interesting, John Mcdonnells almost unilateral opposition to this. When you consider that a0 years ago he fell foul of the glc for precisely that same ideology versus practicality versus legalese, and it was Ken Livingstone who had to say, i cant pull the lever on this. A0 yea rs later i cant pull the lever on this. A0 years later and he is taking on that pragmatic, but stay towards the centre and keep distance on side and keep the establishment onside position. Keep business onside. So it is interesting, to personality splits along these lines. As tony says, it could be illegal. But it puts a big flag on the sand and says, we know everything that is going on and we remain committed to oui going on and we remain committed to our ideology. In a similarfashion it is likely equal opposite of boris, saying do or die on october 31. This is labour reminding us what they want to be about. 31. This is labour reminding us what they want to be about. I would ask mps, how many people have raised this with you on the doorstep. How many voters have said, we need to abolish eaton. It is also problematic for labour mps like diane abbott, who chose to send their children to private schools. She has got to square the circle. She has got to square the circle. She has got to square the circle. She has to answer for this, despite her own choices. You could rationalise that and say that that is because of the current imbalance and you do have a duty to your children. The guardian. Revolt over brea ks children. The guardian. Revolt over breaks policy throws labour into chaos. Brexit policy. Tom watson says, we are a remain party. But lots of the people who traditionally vote labour do not agree. This is an absence of leadership from jeremy corbyn. He is trying to square a circle, he is trying to stand in the middle and be neutral on brexit. I think he is going to end up losing nobody. We have a situation where the vast majority of labour members, activists and mps are remain, true remain. And who also appear to think that notwithstanding the fact that we had a National Referendum and the result was close but decisive, not that referendum should somehowjust be ignored or played around with or gone through for a second time. Well, the lib dems are doing it as well. Yes, but the lib dems have no prospect of forming the next government. The best they could hope for is some sort of coalition, in which they would immediately drop theirdemand. The lib which they would immediately drop their demand. The lib dems have been very explicit, if we win a majority lib dem government we will immediatelyjust stop all of this and we wont go anywhere. I think the chances of them getting a majority, after the last election, i probably shouldnt say this, but the chances of getting a majority lib dem government is very, very small. Labour are putting themselves forward as the next government of the country. And i think this is a really high risk strategy. And i think again, it comes back to the same issue. Brexit is an important issue for you to have a clear and coherent message you can sell on the doorstep, where you can explain it to people in one sentence. And it takes about four or five sentences to explain labour because my current position. And if there is an election soon, surely the Party Conference is the point at which you come up with your policy, or your clarity of thought . Yes. These should be the chest thumping moments, when people sound to their feet and just applaud as one. It is quite remarkable but in an era when borisjohnson is quite remarkable but in an era when Boris Johnson is falling quite remarkable but in an era when borisjohnson is falling foul of quite remarkable but in an era when Boris Johnson is falling foul of the courts, when he is proroguing parliament and going all over the place and going off to europe, and the next thing he says it is going well and Michel Barnier says, no it isnt, even in that climate, the opposition are notjust coalescing and coming up with something to serve as a rebuttal of that, it really is a wide open goal. It is not being used in any way. It pains me to say this, but the average voter doesnt care about parliamentary procedure and is interested in proroguing parliament or the interested in proroguing parliament orthe high interested in proroguing parliament or the high court or the supreme court, but they are interested in borisjohnson saying he court, but they are interested in Boris Johnson saying he will create more Police Officers and spend more money on the nhs. What we see from the tories is a clear item cynical retail offer to the voters, and labour appear to be retail offer to the voters, and labourappearto be in retail offer to the voters, and labour appear to be in some sort of Ideological Echo Chamber at the moment, which is unfortunate for them, given at the Conference Goes oii them, given at the Conference Goes on for another three days. They might surprise us. They might they might surprise us. They might they might be keeping our bestjewels. The son, thomas cook tourist airlift, a0 jumbos to the rescue. 165,000 customers are currently abroad. Talks happening at the moment to see whether they can save thomas cook. I think this is interesting because obviously it is a tiny, tiny number of people against the country as a whole, but i think tony is right. If you get into the abstracts of proroguing parliament and chaos and ideology and private school quotas, this is something that everybody can relate to, which is being stranded on a desert island, however attractive it may be. Personally i wouldnt mind so much right now, if i had a phone call saying you will not get home for another three days. So you can see the problem. Of course, it is symbolic of a bigger problem, but this is a 178 Year Old Company in the throes of collapse, under some sort of miracle can be arranged, and it is also people. I mean, it is a gift to newsmakers. Theyjust have to fly a few people over there, presumably on private jets, to fly a few people over there, presumably on privatejets, and interview them all and you get some. Interview them all and you get some. Not by private jet this is the point. Not every airline in the country has collapsed. Ao jumbos sounds impressive. More than 7800 planes take off in this country every day. So 40 jumbos in that context, not that impressive. You are right, the reason why it is on the front page of the papers is because it is something your average punter understands. You book a holiday, you go abroad, and then. Your average punter holiday, you go abroad, and then. Your average punter i dont know, i dont book with thomas cook, living oii dont book with thomas cook, living on the 21st century, as i do. Do you leave the country . I do i dont really like to, but i do. You do not touch the moment, you would miss something political. That is part of the problem, with the high court coming back i am all that sixes and sevens. Your Carbon Footprint would be small. Minuscule. Very true. It isa be small. Minuscule. Very true. It is a very old company, isnt it . The old est is a very old company, isnt it . The oldest travel agent. Yes, and it has failed to adapt to the writing on the wealth of the travel industry for about 20 years. It was expanding into thousand and seven and 2010. The direction of travel, sorry, the direction of travel for me has been very clear, unless these package holiday organisations try and appeal more online and deal with the reality of the fact that most people like to book these things themselves, but their market share, and the group of people who were using them, was inevitably going to shrink. They have been spending more and more money to keep themselves afloat. There were going to be someone is in the water behind street versus the internet, and u nfortu nately street versus the internet, and unfortunately they were on the losing side. It is nice sometimes to have somebody do it for you, though. Isnt it . A lesson for life. I think you have put this one in as a joke. Daily star gobbyjezzas psycho seagull health. This is a different jeremy, the clarkson variety. We just wanted you to read it out. We have nothing to say. I have been gamed. Tony wanted this, he felt strongly about the seagull health. He is only 59, that is the first thing to note. I thought he was slightly older. He has a farm called diddly squat. No he doesnt you made it up. He does. It grows sweet barley and oil so that he wants to keep it carbon neutral. This is actually from the star. This story appears to have been sourced from instagram, because it says here that angryjezza, instagram, because it says here that angry jezza, that instagram, because it says here that angryjezza, that is jeremy clarkson, notjeremy corbyn, posted a series of instagram images showing the birds swarming over his farm in chipping norton, 0xfordshire. But it is interesting, it is where former para meters is interesting, it is where former parameters to David Cameron lives. Is that interesting . I think it is. This is basicallyjeremy clarkson versus nature. Clarkson nil, nature one. This is surely a tale that precedes time and media and instagram, the idea that you try to grow crops and occasionally wild birds come and take them away. What are we learning . It also says, who wants to be a millionaire quiz master questioner is he . See, you learn things. Such an education. Finally, the daily telegraph. Eating meat should be a crime, says barrister. This is michael mansfield, a vegetarian. A vegetarian barrister. Whats wrong with that . Im saying, it is an itv prime time show that rights itself. I think it is a bit ahead of its time. Ithink i think it is a bit ahead of its time. I think as time goes on, people will for ecological reasons for financial reasons probably eat a lot meat, and i doubt that is probably dependent on how quickly artificial meat can be discovered and produced so that people effectively cannot tell the difference between them, and i think that will be when people in significant numbers commit to a vegetarian lifestyle. It may not be necessary to make it illegal because things will shift. Yes, i think that actually we will not need artificial meat. I think peoples taste buds and pallets will increasingly evolve, as they have done throughout history according to what is provided to them, and i think that perhaps the day i mean, we see it in every high street in the uk. More and more vegetarian options, beacon options, gluten free. And more vegetarian options, beacon options, glutenfree. Well, that is it for the papers tonight. You have been with us for hours. Most of your sunday has been taken up. And im going to be up all night as well, with the emmys. Yes, thank you for spending most of your sunday with us. Thank you for being your usual arch soul. Dont forget, you can see the front of the papers online at the front of the papers online at the bbc news website. It is all about you seven days a its all there for you, seven days a week at bbc. Co. Uk papers. And if you miss the programme any evening you can watch it later on bbc iplayer. Thank you, tony drew and caroline frost. Next on bbc news, its the film review. Mean set hello and welcome to the film review on bbc news. To take us through this weeks cinema releases is Jason Solomons

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.