for dhs 's decision to rescind daca, it fails to elaborate meaningfully on the agencies primary rationale for the decision. the judgment that the policy was unlawful and unconstitutional. he goes on to say while the memo offers several additional policy grounds for daca rescission, most of these simply repackage legal arguments previously made. and insufficiently independent from the agencies evaluation of daca legality to preclude review work to support the agencies decision. an earlier opinion the court did not say dhs lacks the constitutional authority to rescind the program and he says it is not with this ruling either but if dhs wants to rescind the program, they have to give a rational explanation for their decision. saying, the last guy did it wrong is in -- in adequate.