You to try to answer all the questions very briefly and to the current questions and actions that exist in this regard. You were following up , tell the viewers what is the Current Situation and the damage was sent to the government, the government made amendments on it and sent it to the parliament, and it was announced in the parliament, and it was urgently investigated, and we believed that it should be investigated urgently, but considering that the parliament had decided the parts add a social culture to this bill that is not just punishments instead of negative and drunkenness and approve this as an emergency and reach the Judicial Commission of the parliament, the Judicial Commission also formed a committee and in numerous meetings with various experts of the institutions and independent experts and the Research Center was investigated by the Research Center and as such independently here, he submitted the review of his work product to the commission, and in the end, a product came from the commission, and this product was made with the cooperation of mr. Hojatul islam ghazanfarabadi, the head of the Judicial Committee of the parliament and the legal deputy of the judiciary, with the coordination of the head of the judiciary in the review meeting and the necessary coordination. And the cases in which there was a dispute between the Judiciary Commission were resolved to a large extent , and the commission was approved. Now it is being discussed in the public forum. At my service, jabirs plan is in hand lets bring freedom and all other things to be endless demands, the association wants anything, there will be a popular reaction, i cant talk anymore, the officials of the struggle , a more serious law should be implemented and the legislation of the law should be done. We will definitely not approve it, considering these issues in the society, we can see that the authorities have made it possible for the authorities to present a plan today as a layer of hijab and chastity, according to the demand of the people, and now it will be reviewed after two months. The assembly is very important to me as a support to the family through culture and hijab, it has published in 70, half of which is cultural and related to the duties of various institutions and organizations that do not take gold budgets for the hijab and leave the veil. Yes, and the other half of it is allocated to the social responsibilities of the citizens of violations, leaving attention to the fines that were completely negative for activities in the cyber space, announcing the results of the media age, they should Pay Attention to the focus and precision in various materials regarding the cyber space, the role of bloggers and also celebrities have become one of the strengths and positive points in my opinion according to the chairman of the judicial and Legal Commission of the parliament, this bill will be put to the vote of the peoples representatives next week in the public hall of the parliament. Well , mr. Mohebi , please explain the discussion that was raised about the bill at the beginning. All the actions that were declared forbidden in the holy sharia are divided into two general categories, either it is considered in the description of the day and unchangeable, or it is even considered that this is entrusted to the hand of the islamic ruler. In our country, the islamic ruler means the three powers of leadership and all the institutions that were established in the constitution, the position of determining the amount of the guarantee of execution is now in the hands of the parliament and its implementation is in the hands of the judiciary. The person who completely deconstructs the punishments and fines is equal to each other, or some people expect that he must have planned the punishment of whipping for example, or he proposes punishments that disrupt the life of the person , for example, someone suggested that for obscenity and lack of veil, etc. Prohibition of participation in if the entrance examination is taken into account, well, all this has its problems, what is important is that firstly, this islamic government that imposes a punishment, secondly, it should be a deterrent punishment. What is being discussed today is that there are punishments for people in Different Countries according to the events that have happened in the new civilization. Fallen and the new lifestyle of the island fine fine is a deterrent punishment that is used in all legal systems, including european and north american legal systems, and in our country , there is a history of accountability. Takes who thought that the low level of legislation does not mean that we listened to our people in our research, the most important issue in this field is that now, contrary to what is said in public and they say that people want to be without hijab, people actually want to cover. No, its not like that at all. Let me read a statistic for you. In view of the fact that i mentioned that we were in tehrans skyline, a survey was conducted in 2018. They said how much do you believe that the islamic hijab should be made mandatory by the government, and 70 of people were successful. People are saddened by the events of last year and the death of mrs. Amini in the survey after these events, they said that 71 became 40 and 30 dropped , the research showed that it means that people dont believe that it should be mandatory to continue being so free, im just saying that you should find a way to return guidance and negative actions and cases where the police are involved in the process should not be such that this conflict will cause events for the people. Many experts pointed out positive points what is your point of view, and why in those 40 articles of the first bill, the duties of the institutions are addressed, if it was already in the approvals of the Supreme Council of the cultural revolution and other laws. We see the anomalies, this is not the result of just the past year or after the riots, the result of 110 is almost a decade of neglect and inaction by the officials who in this field of duty and almost in the field of khalilis chastity and hijab , there were restraining laws, but unfortunately these did not act and it happened that today we are witnessing such a problem and that the question that you said that the cultural discussion given by the government and the judiciary did not have a cultural part and it was based on what was the opinion of the Cultural Commission and based on the fact that we have an article of all the 820 approvals. We should include the 820th session of the Supreme Council of the cultural revolution, which is seen in the duties of the institutions, in the interpretation of the layer and avoid putting the bill first, because now when the layer has become 70 articles, which can be presented according to the proposal of the representatives on each of the articles. Then , zaman will speak for and against in the hall of the parliament he allocates a long time to himself. Well, this will take a long time to understand, and the opportunity of the parliament is very limited, because we have the plan to approve the 7th plan ahead of us, and we are also patiently waiting for it after that. We have little time, so our effort was this. Considering that cultural issues are also important and should be, but from prolonging the impala butterfly night in the Judicial Commission, the issues that were brought up and it was decided to bring each and every task to the institutions , good tasks have come, but it seems that the amount caused the bill to be stopped. Abdul samad khorramabadi , the judicial deputy of the attorney general of the country, by phone to khorramabadi has been added to our group. Greetings and good times. I have a good time. I am at your service and i say hello to my dear guests. I have two important questions for you, khorramabadi. To give your opinion about the bill and whether the current laws were not satisfactory in your opinion, for example, we had a legal gap, we needed to strengthen it, or if it was needed and removed, will this new bill fill the ethics, strengthen it, or add to it . We have the islamic penal code regarding chastity and hijab the note of article 638 of the law determined a punishment for uncovering the hijab. This was not the case. Our problem was not the lack of law. The problem was not the implementation of this law. Unfortunately, this was not the case. They decided for various institutions, and mrs. Sarkar said that we are going to install these laws and it does not have the necessary feedback and output. In this bill , the powers of the police have been greatly reduced. This police bill is only about nudity and body nudity. He committed this act with him the accused should deal with it anyway, no matter what, just take a picture and let mr. Khorramabadi hear his answer point by point from mr. Mohebi. We will come back again and ask you for the next buildings. If the previous laws or laws were implemented, if they were implemented well, there would be no need for us to take a new layer and have new approvals, and secondly, the authority of the police is drawn here with the layer that is under investigation, which is very strange, which is the judiciary. Mr. Khorramabadi esteghlal came on behalf of the judiciary i am talking about the Prosecutors Office. If i mentioned the previous laws, article 638 of the islamic penal code is implemented by the judiciary, and if it was to be done correctly, why would the judiciary send a layer in this field, and it would have implemented the mother correctly, but this authority would not have sent the bill. Judiciary has done the work, it shows that finally the head of the judiciary, considering that he is responsible for sending judicial bills to the parliament, recognized a need and did not consider it a deterrent, and announced the gaps he saw for the parliament, that the necessary Legal Framework to deal with those who break the norms to exist naturally therefore, to some extent, they also pointed to the shortcomings of the law itself. The next point about the powers of the police is to say that the police should document and that there has been serious damage in this field in the past years, and that the way the people and the police have faced each other. The first person who broke the structure and the police who had events in the winter of last year and in the previous years decided to use another scientific opinion about the legislator from another theory to use, instead of confronting the police and the people face to face, you should pay thousands for this elimination of the police. Use a heavier monetary penalty, for example you you can believe like now that this does not reduce the position of the police. You can see the explanation. Once you are arrested by the police , you will be summoned once. You will not call the police, but the penalty will be greatly increased. Health insurance will be 24 million tomans from the point of view of criminal law. The theory is another theory. So far, it has been shown that this encounter between the police and the people of the irshad patrol has caused harm to us , so that the harm can be reduced. We used another theory that the world is innocent and it can be used. That we are right now after the riots that happened it took 12 months and we are working on drafting a bill and introducing new laws to fix the loopholes or deficiencies of the previous law. There has been a period of ten months , almost a year, when no movement has been made, and now tell me that this message has been given to the society. No, it is not the opinion of some people that this government and system has backed down on the issue of hijab and has no intention of dealing with it. The age of nudity, nudity, and bad clothing is discussed in such a situation, if we are one serious crimes should be imposed on those who are not organized, the Public People of the society, various people in the society, and they are not organized. In the first place, it means that in the first instance , serious crimes should be imposed without warning, and that should be summoned to the Prosecutors Office, in my opinion, it is not appropriate at all. Of course, i recorded your suggestions in the discussion, but my opinion was that in the first place, with a text message that is given to the person, the maximum 8th degree fine should be considered for him, but in the first place, when the person is sent a text message, this remains suspended. If he repeats it in the second stage, he will be fined in addition to the next fine first of all, it should be noted that experience has shown that what farjad did in the debate, millions of people did by getting a warning. I am calm because of this loneliness, is it a physical attack or my executive guarantee will you be sent a text message if this incident reaches them, you are better off than if the person returns to the prosecutor s office in the first place. The Prosecutors Office is actually helping the police we left it blank, thats right, mr. Khorramabadi , lets ask your opinion regarding the explanations of the guests of the program and the next question. I called that there is a program in this field, if they have their personal opinions as an activation of rights, for example, i am not a representative of the judiciary. At the same time, i am in the organizational position of the Deputy Attorney general of the country in matters of supervision. Anyway , the laws are incomplete, they are weak, unfortunately they are legal which is much weaker than from different aspects of the region, much weaker than the previous laws on how to deal with violations and punish sellers of clothes whose use in public is against the city and wearing their clothes and makeup is against sharia or promotes corruption or is there someone who came and told me, no, if you see that covering is not a right, unfortunately , i have defined the duty of the police to consider this law, whether it is outside or bare neck , or ten hours, how many hours can it take to cover, in fact , i came to this law. Those who discover that the hijab is a product of farhad in Different Cases he took away the powers of mobilization and in many cases , he took away the headquarters of commanding the good and forbidding the evil , and he took away the powers of the police. If the Guardian Council is approved, this has many flaws and problems. These flaws of the bill by consuming the body and focusing on this issue, what has been covered, the normalization of the rest of the hijab is encouraged, the law is also incomplete, and in fact, to those who the police see if the hijab is bad. This photo is facing the judiciary, the judiciary stated if i if now that many punishments related to innocence had been lost , we can create a game in the society in one day. In the same way, the bill sent by the judiciary is also live, the letter of the judiciary has also come, in fact, it has increased the fines , reduced the authority of the police in documentation, and issues like this , what happened, what is the difference between the bill sent here, the difference is that there, for example, the police first he gives a warning, then a warning with an online fine from him it can be taken without interfering. Khorramabadis supporters believe that the police should not have their powers reduced. If this is the case, mr. Khorramabadis personal opinion should be reflected to the head of the judiciary in the preparation of the judicial bill. What has happened now is that this conclusion has been reached. It has happened that the Judicial Branch itself has come to this conclusion, i. E. The regulators of elahia food, i have come to the conclusion that the confrontation between the people and the police during the irshad patrol is harmful. Instead of this, another thought should be given. Its like a lady lajordi, who told the police to stop this, but the punishment is small, after warning and detention, i dont know, for example, one of the representatives gave ms. Lajordi a fine of 900 thousand tomans, the first time, warning and detention, i dont know what they were saying, 1 million or, for example, a fine 8th grade cash or one and a half million tomans means that now the Judicial Branch can get one and a half million tomans, which is not tied, in addition to the fact that it will be too late, in the islamic penal code, fines have been graded and the maximum 6th grade fine of 550 million tomans has been approved. That is, with the consensus that was made with the officials of the judiciary, this 24 million tomans and a point about the powers of the constables was approved. The officers said that their powers have been reduced in relations such as those of the basij officers, and the law on judicial protection of the mobilization of the officers mentioned in article 29 of the criminal Procedure Code of iran is all on its own, the only difference is as follows. Now the police can no longer make arrests, they have to document it and give it to the authority and the veiled person to collect the fine, he cant do this either , but this police has all those other powers regarding nudity and nudity and how to deal with it. I dont want to arrest, the system has come to the conclusion that it should find another way. In the bill he sent, the judiciary has also given instructions for this idea instead of the patrol because of the fines and the difference , you will get a police ninja, here he will get a mahdi. When you cross a red light, it doesnt matter, for example, my child, you have a land cruiser, we have a 206, it doesnt matter in any case , we will pay a fine of 1000 tomans, but a person who is punished for this kind of thing may need a discount, maybe you need to intensify it, maybe how much once done, these rules of frequency and repetition if the case prevails, one person may commit to the court. You are sure that this person will commit this sentence again. The life sentence will be reduced by a million tomans. Individualization of the punishment cannot be done by the police. Do everything. Mrs. Fatemeh mohammad beigi, member of parliament, mrs. Mohammad beigi has been added to our lives. Hello, have a good time, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. Hello, good night and condolences on the occasion of muharram. To all dear viewers, thank you for what has come out of the comments of the guests of the program so far. To the Deputy Attorney general of the country, mr. Khorramabadi, of course, they express their personal opinions. And they believe that there are current laws and they are good laws, of course, there have been criticisms of some cases, but i know that the new bill contains points in some parts that need to be paid attention to, and in some areas it even