PTAB Strategies and Insights - January 2021: Petitioner's District Court Stipulation Results in PTAB Trial Institution Under the PTAB's Fintiv Analysis | Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In December 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB” or “Board”) designated an opinion as precedential (
. Masimo Corporation),[i] where the Board instituted trial, i.e., did not exercise its discretion to deny institution under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), after carefully considering the unique facts of a parallel district court proceeding. Specifically, the Board applied the
Fintiv factors to ultimately determine that, because Petitioner had filed a stipulation in district court, instituting trial would still preserve the efficiency and integrity of the patent system.
The
In March 2020, the PTAB set forth six

Related Keywords

Goldstein Fox ,Sotera Wireless Inc ,See Apple Inc ,Fintiv Inc ,Masimo Corporation ,Patent Trial ,Appeal Board ,Sotera Wireless ,Fintiv Factors ,Patent Owner ,Preliminary Patent Owner Response ,கோல்ட்ஸ்டைன் நரி ,பார்க்க ஆப்பிள் இன்க் ,மசிமோ நிறுவனம் ,காப்புரிமை சோதனை ,முறையீடு பலகை ,காப்புரிமை ஓநர் ,ப்ரிலிமிநரீ காப்புரிமை ஓநர் பதில் ,