Second Circuit Establishes Practical Pleading Requirement for Prohibited Transaction Claims Under ERISA Section 406(a)(1)(C) | Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog

The Second Circuit recently held that in order to state a claim for a prohibited transaction pursuant to ERISA section 406(a)(1)(C), it is not enough to allege that a fiduciary caused...

Related Keywords

,Cornell University ,Executive Compensation ,Second Circuit ,Tenth Circuits ,Third Circuit ,Seventh Circuit ,Tenth Circuit ,Ninth Circuits ,Eighth Circuit ,Ninth Circuit ,