இன்டர்ஸ்டேட் வர்த்தகம் தரகு முடித்தல் நாடகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The District of Columbia District Court recently issued the first judicial interpretation of 49 US Code Section 10706(a)(3)(B)(ii), which sets out an evidentiary exemption relating to certain agreements among railroads. On its face, the decision s reach appears limited. However, the opinion provides insight into the judicial interpretation of antitrust exemptions and practical reminders for rail and other industries that have legitimate, and sometimes legally protected, communications with competitors. Staggers Act In 1980 Congress enacted the Staggers Rail Act as part of the deregulation of the rail industry to allow for more competition between railroads and between rail and other modes of transport such as trucking. Section 10706(a)(3)(B)(ii), recodified without substantive changes in the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act 1995, provides for the exclusion of evidence relating to and bars inferences arising from discussions and agreements coordinating so-called inter

United statesCommerce commission terminationSupreme courtDepartment of justiceDistrict of columbia courtCredit suisse securities united statesColumbia district courtStaggers rail actInterstate commerce commission termination actRail freight fuel surcharge antitrust litigationFederal trade commissionSurface transportation boardSuisse securitiesஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்வர்த்தகம் தரகு முடித்தல்உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்