vimarsana.com

Page 242 - எங்களுக்கு சமம் வேலைவாய்ப்பு வாய்ப்பு தரகு News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Calif DFEH Reporting: New Web Page and FAQs

California Pay Data Reporting: New Web Page and 10 FAQs for Employers That Report to the DFEH Friday, February 5, 2021 On September 30, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a pay data reporting requirement for employers that assigns responsibility for collecting such data to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). To assist employers with this filing requirement, the DFEH recently established a web page and published answers to a a series of frequently asked questions (FAQs) that address several topics related to the upcoming filings, which are due no later than March 31, 2021. The DFEH published its FAQs in four waves, publishing the first on November 2, 2020, and the most recent on February 1, 2021. The FAQs answer several important questions, including: which employers are subject to the filing requirement; how employees in and out of California are treated for purposes of determining filing jurisdiction; and which emplo

Editorial: It s time to level the playing field

Editorial: It’s time to level the playing field February 3, 2021 501 Views As we’ve seen in the sports world, the best teams win championships; not the best player. We as an American society could reflect this truth if we would let ourselves. All too often, people are held back from being great at what they do because of their skin color, gender, etc. This has to stop. Imagine if Tom Brady wasn’t allowed to play football because he was white. Imagine if Michael Jordan wasn’t allowed to play basketball because he was black. In Brady, the people of New England would have lost the captain of their beloved Patriots, the man who would take them to the Super Bowl nine times and come away with six victories.

Sixth Circuit Extends Ban of Short Limit to ADA and ADEA Claims

Thursday, February 4, 2021 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the appellate court responsible for the federal district courts of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, recently made clear that claims asserted under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) cannot be subject to contractually shortened limitation periods. In  Thompson v. Fresh Products, LLC, No. 20-3060 (January 15, 2021), the Sixth Circuit held that the statute of limitations for claims arising under the ADA and ADEA is a substantive right that cannot be waived by agreement of the parties. This decision was an extension of the Sixth Circuit’s 2019 decision in 

Sixth Circuit Extends Ban of Contractually Shortened Limitations Periods to ADA and ADEA Claims | Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P C

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the appellate court responsible for the federal district courts of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, recently made clear that claims asserted under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) cannot be subject to contractually shortened limitation periods. In Thompson v. Fresh Products, LLC, No. 20-3060 (January 15, 2021), the Sixth Circuit held that the statute of limitations for claims arising under the ADA and ADEA is a substantive right that cannot be waived by agreement of the parties. This decision was an extension of the Sixth Circuit’s 2019 decision in

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.