Page 5 - எட்டாவது நீதித்துறை மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The Supreme Court’s latest foray into personal jurisdiction – Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court – seems to raise more questions than answers regarding the contours of specific jurisdiction. A curious result, given the eight-member panel 1 unanimously agreed that Ford was subject to specific jurisdiction in the forums – Montana and Minnesota – where the underlying suits were filed. Writing for the five-member majority, Justice Kagan reached this conclusion by recognizing that specific jurisdiction may exist where a defendant’s extensive activity is “related to” the plaintiff’s claims, even if not the but-for cause. The concurring opinions heavily criticized the majority’s “new test,” lamenting that the majority offered lower courts and litigants little guidance for discerning the limits of “related to” specific jurisdiction.

United statesJustice kaganJustice barrettJustice alitoJustice gorsuchSupreme courtInternational shoe idInternational shoe coFord motor coMontana eighth judicial district courtInternational shoeFord motorEighth judicial district courtPersonal jurisdictionWhile fordஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்