The European Union and Britain on Thursday agreed a post-Brexit trade deal after almost ten months of tortuous negotiations to govern ties when the UK exits the single market.
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
It is easy to dismiss some EAT decisions as a storm in a teacup, legally-speaking, all very traumatic for those bobbing about in them, but of little significance to the wider world of employment law or practice.
Steer – v – Stormsure Limited earlier this month is not one of those decisions. It has the potential to alter very significantly both the law relating to remedies for discrimination and in particular, the practical balance of power in the conduct of discrimination litigation. It is not law yet but there seems every chance of its becoming so within the next 18 months. All employers should keep their eyes open for this one.
Justice minister nominee: ECHR to announce judgement on Russia-Georgia war in January 2021
Georgia urges to hold Russia responsible for violating a number of articles of the European Convention of Human Rights. Photo: Nino Alavidze/Agenda.ge Agenda.ge, 22 Dec 2020 - 21:06, Tbilisi,Georgia
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) will announce its judgement on the Russia-Georgia war of August 2008 on January 21, 2020.
Justice Minister nominee Gocha Lortkipanidze stated earlier today that the ‘truth of Georgia’ at the court ‘is supported by evidence’.
the right to life
the right to respect private and family life
the right to an effective legal remedy
MIL-OSI United Kingdom: People Before Profit MLA Calls For BLM Fines To Be Dropped After Ombudsman Report foreignaffairs.co.nz - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from foreignaffairs.co.nz Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
December 14, 2020 10:51:19 am
The Constitutional Court of Austria ruled Friday that the ban on wearing headscarves in elementary schools is unconstitutional as a violation of the principle of equality in connection with an individual’s right to religious freedom.
Section 43a of the School Education Act of 1986 prohibited the wearing of any ideological or religious clothing involving the covering of the head until the age of 10. The purpose of the provision cites social integration of children in accordance with local customs and traditions and preservation of basic constitutional values as well as equality between men and women.
The provision was challenged by two students and their parents as a disproportionate interference with their right to religious freedom and religious child-rearing. The court declared the ban unconstitutional, stating that the provision violated the right to equality in connection with the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion since it onl