vimarsana.com

Page 212 - ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Hiscox Ltd sets aside another US$48mln after coronavirus business insurance judgement

UK Supreme Court Sides With Policyholders In COVID-19 Business Interruption Test Case - Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Introduction On January 15, 2021, the UK s Supreme Court (UKSC) rendered its much-awaited decision on business interruption (BI) coverage for COVID-19 (the Test Case ). See our earlier postings for a review of the lower court decision 2 BI coverage is typically offered as additional insurance on a property insurance policy. BI coverage is designed to protect the insured from lost revenue and increased business expenses that might result from a covered property loss policy (such events being described as insured perils ).  However, many policies also include extensions which provide coverage even where there may be no damage to, or loss of, property. Examples include

Old is the new new – the rule against penalties in Singapore | White & Case LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Liquidated damages clauses are often attacked in common law jurisdictions for being unenforceable penalties . The test for what constitutes a penalty has been reviewed in common law jurisdictions over recent years. Last month, the Singapore Court of Appeal gave welcome clarity to the penalty test in that country. Background: The rule against penalties A contractual breach can create a host of issues, not only over liability, but also the consequences arising out of it. To provide some certainty, parties often stipulate in the contract what damages one party has to pay if it breaches the contract in a certain way. Such provisions are commonly known as liquidated damages clauses, because the clause defines or liquidates the damages that are payable.

UK Supreme Court Decisions in Unwired Planet V Huawei and Hauwei V Conversant | Ladas & Parry LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On August 26, 2020, the United Kingdom Supreme Court handed down its unanimous combined decision in the cases of Unwired Planet v. Huawei and Huawei v. Conversant. Both cases involved questions of: Whether the contracts entered into by those who had participated in standards setting by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and agreed to license any standards essential patents (SEPs) they held on Fair Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms contemplated such FRAND terms being set out on a global basis; Whether the FRAND requirement consisted of separate fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory components or whether the term was a single unitary obligation;

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.