Next Caller Wins Jury Verdict Finding No Patent Infringement in TRUSTID Lawsuit
Share Article NEW YORK (PRWEB) July 16, 2021 Next Caller, a leading provider of enterprise-grade caller verification solutions, shares its reaction to the outcome of civil order 18-172-MN in the United States District Court for District of Delaware case TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller Inc.
“We are very gratified by the jury’s verdict validating the core Next Caller technology,” said Ian Roncoroni, CEO of Next Caller. “I would like to sincerely thank the Judge, the Court staff, and the jurors for their tireless efforts in this case, especially in these difficult times.”
Share this article
Share this article
NEW YORK, July 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Ocugen, Inc. ( Ocugen or the Company ) (NASDAQ: OCGN) and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and docketed under 21-cv-03182, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Ocugen securities between February 2, 2021, and June 10, 2021, inclusive (the Class Period ), seeking to recover damages for violations of the federal securities laws under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
Print
WASHINGTON - A federal judge in Texas has largely halted an Obama administration initiative that grants work permits and reprieves from deportation to undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children - calling the program “unlawful” even as he allowed the more than 600,000 young people already in it to keep their protected status. U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen sided with Texas and other states in his ruling that President Barack Obama, a Democrat, overstepped his executive authority when he created the program. Hanen’s ruling called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, an “illegally implemented program” and said “the public interest of the nation is always served by the cessation of a program that was created in violation of law.”