La Justicia Federal rechazó amparo del municipio de Vicente López contra el decreto 241 infoban.com.ar - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from infoban.com.ar Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
.
That decision was anything but a complete victory for the Commission s position. Indeed, Justice Breyer wrote a relatively nuanced opinion holding, most importantly, that such settlements were not a
per se antitrust violation (the FTC s original position). Rather, the Court held that such agreements must be evaluated under the rule of reason. However, reasonableness (
i.e., how tightly tethered to reality) of any such determination depends in larger part on the reasoner, and this characteristic (or flaw) is illustrated in the first full-fledged appellate affirmance of the FTC in a reverse payment settlement case,
The case arose over a settlement between branded drug maker Endo against Impax over its extended-release oxymorphone opioid drug product, Opana ER. The agreement, entered into before the Supreme Court s
Supreme Court Rules in Google s Favor in Copyright Dispute with Oracle Over Android Software | Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
A federal judge in New Hampshire allowed part of an ACLU lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) checkpoints in three New England states to continue, but invoked a qualified immunity defense saying CBP agents could not be sued.
Last year, the ACLU sued the CBP over roadside checkpoints in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.
The ACLU argued that the CBP roadside checkpoints were conducted for the primary purpose of general crime control and drug interdiction and that they are beyond the scope of the CBP’s authority.
“It is unconstitutional for Border Patrol to use interior checkpoints, nearly 100 miles from the border, as a ruse to unlawfully search and seize people for the purpose of general crime control. Yet this is exactly what Border Patrol is doing with checkpoints in northern New England.”