board=Military&u=johnwong
[ 1 ]
标 题: 政府连无家可归者人血馒头都吃
Jose agencies spend clearing hundreds of homeless encampments?
Marisa Kendall
Categories:California News, City Politics, Housing, Latest Headlines, Local
News, Local Politics, News, Politics
Efforts to clear, prevent and manage San Jose’s homeless encampments cost
the city and partner agencies almost $8.6 million in 2019, according to a
new federal report that highlights the fiscal toll of different cities’
responses to their unhoused communities.
The report released this month by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development analyzed spending in four cities, including San Jose, and found
dealing with encampments is a major undertaking for cities, which get little
Once Again, Lake Oroville and Other Reservoirs Are at Drought Emergency Levels sfist.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sfist.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Lehigh faces oversight, environment challenges Written by Bruce Barton
No news may be good news for residents living near a long-standing quarry and cement plant in the foothills just south of Los Altos.
A host of regulators participating in Santa Clara County Supervisor Joe Simitian’s annual meeting last week on the status of Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. operations described a “quiet year” in 2020, with an overall slowdown in activity. A recently filed Lehigh lawsuit against the county planning department, however, underscores the company’s continued efforts to secure the necessary approvals to expand operations.
On hand at Simitian’s March 3 meeting were officials from oversight agencies that ranged from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the county planning department. As the county’s biggest polluter, the cement plant and quarry are subjected to numerous air a
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
“The more I know, the less I understand/All the things I thought I’d figured out, I have to learn again” – Don Henley, “
The Heart of the Matter”
One of CEQA’s bedrock principles is that environmental review must precede project approval. (E.g.,
POET, LLC v. California Air Resources Board (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1214; CEQA Guidelines, § 15004(a).) To reverse the order and “put the cart before the horse” would be anathema, i.e., to sanction uninformed and undemocratic lead agency decision making, and to encourage irretrievable commitments of resources and post-hoc rationalizations that foreclose mitigations and alternatives and sweep environmental considerations under the rug. Right? Well … maybe not. In the area of State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB” or the “State Board”) water quality certifications (“WQCs”) under the Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”; 33 U.S.C §