vimarsana.com

ஜோர்டான் கோவ் திரவமாக்கப்பட்டது இயற்கை வாயு ப்ராஜெக்ட் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Coastal News Today | OR - More Bad News For The Jordan Cove Energy Project

On Tuesday, the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals reversed a pair of key permits, one issued by Coos County, the other by the Town of Coos Bay. Between them, the permits cleared the way for expanded dredging and other site preparation in the Coos Bay estuary. That work is required for the planned liquified natural gas export terminal proposed by the Canadian energy firm Pembina. The permits were challenged by conservation groups and tribes, who claimed the permits were illegally issued. The appeals board agreed, and – in an unusual move reversed both permits outright, rather than send them back to the city and the county for reconsideration.

State reverses two local permits, dealing another blow to Jordan Cove Energy Project

State reverses two local permits, dealing another blow to Jordan Cove Energy Project Updated 6:36 PM; Today 6:34 PM A rendering of the proposed Jordan Cove LNG terminal in Coos Bay. (Courtesy of Jordan Cove) LC- Jordan Cove Energy ProjectLC- Jordan Cove Energy Project Facebook Share By Liam Moriarty | Jefferson Public Radio The proposed Jordan Cove Energy Project in southwest Oregon was dealt another setback this week when a pair of local permits was overturned by the state land use board. On Tuesday, the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals reversed a pair of key permits, one issued by Coos County, the other by the Town of Coos Bay. Between them, the permits cleared the way for expanded dredging and other site preparation in the Coos Bay estuary.

More Bad News For The Jordan Cove Energy Project

Originally published on May 5, 2021 9:58 pm On Tuesday, the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals reversed a pair of key permits, one issued by Coos County, the other by the Town of Coos Bay. Between them, the permits cleared the way for expanded dredging and other site preparation in the Coos Bay estuary. That work is required for the planned liquified natural gas export terminal proposed by the Canadian energy firm Pembina. The permits were challenged by conservation groups and tribes, who claimed the permits were illegally issued. The appeals board agreed, and – in an unusual move reversed both permits outright, rather than send them back to the city and the county for reconsideration.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.