it? it expecting, 'ust a brief visit, isn't it? , ., , expecting, 'ust a brief visit, isn't it? , ., y ., , expecting, 'ust a brief visit, isn't it? , ., , ., , , , it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10-26 and — it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 and we _ it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 and we were _ it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 and we were told - it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 and we were told he i it? it is only a brief visit. it is 10.26 and we were told he is| it? it is only a brief visit. it is - 10.26 and we were told he is due here around 10.30, so in about five minutes from now also. as you mentioned, the red carpet has been laid out and about an hour ago we saw the sniffer dogs doing the rounds here in downing street. unsurprisingly, you have the world's media on the doorstep, including the white house travelling press pack as well. this is the first time president biden has come here to meet prime minister rishi sunak. they have met on a number of occasions, they met in washington not too long ago as well. they have met on the west coast of america, they have met injapan as well. they met in ireland as well. they have met in ireland as well. they have met on a number of occasions but president biden is coming to downing street for these talks. we are told they won't last any longer than an
Verified Market Research recently published a report, “Electrophysiology Market” By Product (Electrophysiology Laboratory Devices, Electrophysiology Ablation
The Central government is all set to celebrate 'Good Governance' week from December 20 to December 26, according to the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievance (DARPG).
all sorts of irregularities and fraud to march into our election system, and it is time we take charge of this. obviously, sir, you always respond to everything with data and facts. what's your response to this? >> well, what he says is just hyperbole and rhetoric. if you really look at it during a post election down in ware county, there was about a 37-count vote difference was about a 0.26% difference. he said it was 26%. he can't do math. he said his election was fair and balanced, but president trump's wasn't. that's a double-minded person. as a pastor, he should know better. >> he's not the only republican who happily accepted the results of their winning election but somehow claimed it hurt president donald trump mr.
Transcripts for MSNBC Way Too Early With Kasie Hunt 20201123 10:47:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
requires them - i agree with the analysis. this is a very common constitutional analysis because police have to have a reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle because it is considered seizure under the 14th amendment so this was the issue because later, brought down to the station, blows a 0.26 which is rather high number. defense attorneys attacked because if it was an unconstitutional stop it would be a win to get the dui dismissed. mike: defendant's attorney to the seattle times, randall jamison junior said the ruling, quote, allows for what most think are bogus stops by police. >> that is where the defense attorney would go to throw the evidence out. it is fair to say you have to
could come at a cost to actual jobs. and one of the city's largest private employers is fighting back. dan springer reports from washington on whether a text to clean up the city could actually clean out job growth. >> the city of seattle with its booming tech industry has opposed to lower the boom on the job creators, the council is considering $0.26 for every workmen on the city that grows $20 million a year. >> some businesses will die or leave seattle because of this. >> the tax will raise $75 million from around 600 companies. among them home street bank which has 700 employees in seattle just across the city line. >> when you start creating a scenario where it is much more attractive to house employees outside the city. and that is bad for the city. it is bad for jobs it is bad for the city economy. >> the tax revenue will be used to build homeless shelters, tiny house villages and affordable apartments. despite spending on homelessness
vote in washington. that's the lebs day. if this same thing happens, that's an 11-point difference. if at that happened, saccone will be sitting down there at 42 in the absentee ballot. he could lose significant ground to lamb. down here in green there's only 200 we won't know until tomorrow. this is all building of is there going to be a roo count? we think a can't can request one if he says for it. i think that might be an issue. but right now the gap between these candidates sits at 0.26. this law is very nebulous, it sit at 0 .26. that would set up remaining absentees and maybe a scattering of provisions, show you what's left. lamb's got to basically get two-thirds of what's left if he wants to push that .26 over that
i'm tell you, you won't believe how small the numbers are. we're not talking about the top 1% of americans who control 40% of the country's wealth. when it comes to campaign spending, we're talking about small fractions of 1%. this chart shows about 68% of all donations. this amount of the total money in campaigns comes from 0.26% of the country. so fewer than two thirds of 1% of americans were responsible for more than two thirds of all the money spent in the 2010 election. how about this? here's about 25% of the money contributed to federal campaigns in 2010. about a quarter of the money came from 0.01% of americans. 1% of 1% of the country gave 25% of all the money spent in the last election cycle. as for this year's election in what's becoming the year of seemingly limitless spending, about 80% of the money raised by
all donations. this amount of the total money in campaigns comes from 0.26% of the country. so fewer than two thirds of 1% of americans were responsible for more than two thirds of all the money spent in the 2010 election. how about this? here's about 25% of the money contributed to federal campaigns in 2010. about a quarter of the money came from 0.01% of americans. 1% of 1% of the country gave 25% of all the money spent in the last election cycle. as for this year's election in what's becoming the year of seemingly limitless spending, about 80% of the money raised by super pacs has come from 0.000063% of americans. four zeros after the decimal point. so democracy is being fueled by