Page 2 - 16th Amendment News Today

One of the worst years ever, 1913 gave us the tools that support the largest government in history.

The question presented in Moore is: “Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states.” Specifically in the Moore case, the question is whether Congress may tax as income the Moores’ pro rata share of the undistributed earnings of a corporation in which they are shareholders.

His yacht. and by doing so, he is able to deduct a very large amount of money from his taxes, based on the amount of money that business ostensibly loses each year. what propublica has turned up which appears to be true is that its all a lie. that this company only exists to service his yachts and his yachts alone, that its not a profit seeking business, that its not a business expense in that he is manipulating and exploiting the tax code for illegal purposes. i think its important we take a st...

The amount of money that business ostensibly loses each year. what propublica has turned up which appears to be true is that its all a lie. that this company only exists to service his yachts and his yachts alone, that its not a profit seeking business, that its not a business expense in that he is manipulating and exploiting the tax code for illegal purposes. i think its important we take a step back here ayman. the supreme court literally just took up a case thats designed to roll back the 16t...

The plaintiffs in this case say they received no actual income from their investments in an indian company, but they still got a tax bill. they sued, alleging that the tax was unconstitutional under the 16th amendment, which grants congress the power to levy and income tax, because they claim that their investment doesnt actually qualify as income, the case essentially revisits the laws definition of income, and whether individuals and companies must realize or receive profits from their investm...

In regard to income from illegal activities being taxable by the feds, that happens to be true. But, studying this aspect of federal taxation reveals

Asset appreciation. we left england because of levying taxes at will. the constitution, the 16th amendment says you can levy taxes on income but if you have a painting or a stock or something that grows in value its not income, youre not getting money, but yet youre going the tax people, that is a dangerous prospect in an unconstitutional one that the wall street journal points out. >> it plays out to the presidents face. i think hes itching for that populist message to explain, okay, its a comp...

A Washington state couple will soon ask the Supreme Court to disallow what they consider to be an ...

Former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent Joe Banister has revealed that the agency wants to further tax hard-working Americans. Banister, also known as the Agent For Truth, made this [...]

Make any sort of regulation regarding firearms. they also want to treat homosexuality as an abnormal lifestyle choice, and that is language that was not included in the 2018 or 2020 party platforms, that would have changed the u.s. constitution and repealed the 16th amendment of 1913 which created the federal income tax, essentially doing away with that. and they would like it declare all businesses and jobs as essential and a fundamental right, and that, of course, would be a response to covid-...