Page 2 - 18 Usc News Today

Liz cheney believes there could be groundwork for criminal charges. 18 usc 1512, the obstruction statute. any chance we see the committee actually subpoena donald trump himself? >> you know, probably. its interesting that liz cheney is talking like a prosecutor. as you say, katie, shes using the precise language of the federal statute 1512 that reads, whoever corruptly instructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding or attempts to do so shall be imprisoned for not more than 20 years. th...

Person to coerce or influence through bribery, a billion dollars, or extortion, a foreign nation into taking action -- oh, yeah, they took action, fire the prosecutor. that might financially benefit the person, his family, hunter, or business. thats just the tip of the ice beg. 18 usc 201 c. whoever gives offers a billion dollars or promises anything of value to a public official, to influence an official act -- fire the prosecutor -- is guilty of bribery. wow, these are real laws. 18 usc 201 b,...

Through bribery, a billion dollars, or extortion, a foreign nation into taking action -- oh, yeah, they took action, fire the prosecutor. that might financially benefit the person, his family, hunter, or business. thats just the tip of the iceberg.es 18 usc 201 c. whoever gives offers a billion dollars or promises anything of value to a public official, to influence an official act -- fire the prosecutor -- is guilty of bribery. wow, these are real laws. 18 usc 201 b, giving, offering, promising...

Us. foreign corrupt practices act. 15 usc, 78, quote, "it is illegal for a u.s. to coerce or influence, through bribery or extortion, a foreign nation into taking action -- might financially benefit that person, his family or business." hunter, that seems to fit. and according to gregg jarrett, the vice president biden used his public office, vp, to influence and coerce a a for official to taking action that benefited bidens son, and biden has looked broken the law. if bribery 201c, whoever corr...

Dollars. again, how about the gratuities ask? 18 usc 201b, giving, offering or promising anything of value to a public official, ukraine, 1 billion, in exchange for any official act -- fire him, six hours -- looks bad. and look at the hobbs act, 18 usc 1951, a threat to a foreign official in order to obtain an official benefit affecting any foreign state of commerce would -- extortion. i will let law-enforcement to their jobs but i think we now need an official criminal investigation opened here...

Tripping over himself and key findings which is exactly what republicans were hoping for. >> in the cloakial context, known public context collusion and conspiracy are essentially synonymous terms, correct? >> no. >> in that page 180 of volume one of your report, it says as defined in legal dictionaries collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in general conspiracy statute 18 usc 371. you said you coast your words carefully are you contradicting your report righ...

Generally raises the questions of obstruct what? are they obstructing the grand jury investigation which is the more classic type of case? this meeting in the trump tower with the russians was pretty early, and its hard to imagine that would be a case for obstruction. but we obviously dont know what mueller has. but the danger here is that when people go on the record, their risk is magnified. as a criminal defense attorney, this is the most precarious time for a client, in my view, because you ...

We havent talked about the sponge thing because we think some of those things are beyond the pail. >> how about when she said she was shot at? >> that was talked about at length last time. >> in the context of ben carson, you have to be saying hillary clintons veracity is often challenged. shes proven to be a liar in many cases. marco rubio. new today, the foundation is refusing to answer questions about her senior aide huma abedin in a very shady, probably i believe illegal arrangement with the...

And if theyre, the chairman wants to know how officials will be punished for violating this law, lying to a fisa judge. and not following protocol. this letter also points out how using this false information in a fisa court, could violate several laws. look at them on the screen. 18 usc 242, using color of law to conduct a targeted investigation based on the pretext of law enforcement and have you 50 usc 1809, surveillance conducted under color of law in a manner not authorized by a fisa conspi...