online, people drawing their own conclusions about what happened, and this will also be in the review today. this will also be in the review toda . , ,., this will also be in the review toda. , ., today. anneli, this report has now been published today. anneli, this report has now been published in today. anneli, this report has now been published in the today. anneli, this report has now been published in the past - today. anneli, this report has now been published in the past few- been published in the past few moments. i know you have to have a chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? this chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? chance to have a look at it, what are the main findings? this has “ust been published fl are the main findings? this has “ust been published in i are the main findings? this has “ust been published in the i are the main findings? this has “ust been published in the last i are the main findings? thi
Or your 10th draft. You get to create the room where it happens. Just dont think you have to do it alone. The powerful backing of american express. Dont live life without it. Welcome to politics nation. This morning were following two developing stories, both with no clear sign of where or how they will end. First a bombshell report by the New York Times claims that the number two official at the Justice Department suggested wearing a wire to take the president of the United States. And the president is now
political reporter at axios. Let me start with you, darren. The whole question of the New York Times report that rosenstein had said in a meeting at the Justice Department that maybe he should wear a wire and meet with the president of the United States or maybe others should, and even brought up about imposing the 25th Amendment which says the president is incapable of his duties. And one person said he was being sarcastic, others are saying he was very serious. We dont know, we we
person in that courtroom. that honor belongs to his honor, judge juan who the country is becoming increasingly familiar with and he is going to make donald trump face the music. in the overall context of american history, this is the first time in nearly 250 years of our history that the president of the united states is on criminal trial. this is big stuff historically. judge juan merchan is a big figure historically because he is beginning the accountability process as it relates to donald trump. i have enjoyed this conversation with both of you. please come back together, separately, but i want to see both again soon. thank you so much.
possible. so that s actually saying when he says you gotta be a little lower class. he is encouraging them to go down right, not to go up. that is what authoritarians do, and it s already worked which is why they are indeed, they have become complicit with these crimes. you ve got you know, talk about just bringing it all down to a lower level. you know now have house republicans threatening to impeach joe biden on behalf of trump with no evidence, no reason, no rationale other than trump got impeached so therefore by biden should be impeached. you ve got these issues out here like that. talk to us about how the authority fire authoritarian peace within the party co-ops the accountability process. what trump is also doing is the old trick of divide and rule. it s when you have these
people like lindsey graham who said count me out on january 6th because he thought mitch mcconnell who talked openly about after the impeachment there might be a trial of donald trump for what he did that day, this ain t over. we re in it because the guy who led the gathering he hasn t been convicting of inciting it he he led it. he s back to running for president. the attack on our democracy is live and well and happening now. it may get more tense as people around donald trump try to take the first real criminal accountability process that exists and pretend it s something else we re a long way from the hand wringing, oh, my god, what if the law is enforced? what if it s not what if we lose our democracy?