Page 526 - Accuracy News Today

He said that general michael flynn was aware of smiths operations. >> was there any legitimacy to that? was flynn aware? >> flynn has not commented but the campaign said if peter smith was doing something with general flynn, that was in general flynns private capacity. it is still not entirely clear to what extent mike flynn was involved in in. there is no doubt that these two menu each other. >> an attorney for michael flynn didnt return our calls or e-mails seeking comment. in the end, shane h...

Whether they came from the russian cutout. peter smith told the journal that general flynn then serving as national security adviser to the trump campaign was aware of smiths operations. >> was there any legitimacy to that? did flynn have any ties to the campaign? >> well, flynn has not commented -- and that if peter smith was doing something with flynn that was in general flynns private capacity. so its still not entirely clear to what extent mike flynn was involved in this. theres no doubt tha...

Interest in whether they came from a russian cut out. he told the adjourn then michael flynn serving as national security advisor from the trump campaign was aware of smiths operations. was there any legitimacy to that, was flynn tied to the campaign? >> the campaign if peegter smith was doing something with general flen, that was in general flynns private capacity. it is not entirely clear to what extent mike flynn was involved in this. there is no doubt these two men knew each other. >> repo...

Into the meeting thinking that with a publicist told him was actually accurate because it would be the first time a publicist ever said something accurate, because its not their job. their job is to exaggerate. a little context that the so stupid viewers maybe dont have that you and i and don, jr., will share. >> tucker: some of my favorite people are british publicist by the way, but accuracy maybe not one of the strong suits. thats fantastic, thanks for joining us tonight. >> pleasure. >> tuck...

Credibility and journalistic accuracy, would this be fair to say? >> i think that is probably mostly fair. any politician wants to get positive coverage or coverage that they view as fair. if their opponents would have a different definition of what constitutes fairness. will this ever die down? as long as the media continues to be pretty aggressively hostile to the administration, not just adversarial, but hostile. as long as they keep getting somethings wrong, sometimes in a big way, it behoov...

Thing haesz thats happened today, jeffrey lord, that you thought something the president said was reaganesque. >> he was also churchillian. between churchill and reagan. >> right. right. but, you know, it was a good thing to do. but i dont think -- and one of the things that would help here, at least its my understanding and maybe you guys know better than i, whether the democratic national committee is withholding forensics on their server. that certainly would tell us, wouldnt it? >> i suppose...

>> between churchill and reagan. >> right. right. but, you know, it was a good thing to do. but i dont think -- and one of the things that would help here, at least its my understanding and maybe you guys know better than i, whether the democratic national ske wicommittee is withholding forensics on its server. that certainly would tell us, wouldnt it? >> i suppose the president didnt bring that up today, jeffrey, while he was doing that. i think thats a rabbit hole. that isnt part of what happe...

On. >> do you think there is some gray area there, that it might not be what either of those men have described it as? >> maybe it was halfway. maybe it was brought up once and not several times. that being said, the united states needs to come from a position of strength when dealing with russia. weve seen that today whether that is actually -- >> what should the president be doing? >> well, the president should certainly be representing the united states from certainly democratic values, which...

Control to a splashdown. it speaks to their advancements and guidance. where do we stand now? in terms of range, we have to give them a green light. they have shown for the first time, they can launch an intercontinental ballistic missile. they have to replicate it. they could hit maybe places like hawaii or the lower 48 if they keep making progress. what about accuracy? they have not yet proven they can make something fly this far and necessarily hit what it is aiming at. that is also a big hur...

What about accuracy. this is a yellow light, a caution light here. they have not yet proven that they can make something fly this far and necessarily hit what it is aiming at. that is also a big hurdle to get over there. remember, they had some big failures in their missile tests earlier this year as well. and the real stopper, of course, is the last one here. the purpose of an icbm quite frankly is to carry a nuclear warhead and there is no indication that they have been able to miniaturize a w...