Page 151 - Accuser News Today

>> and its costing me over million dollars to do it, my insurance premiums have skyrocketed, people have canceled events, its as if ive been found guilty of something. ive called for an fbi investigation. i immediately took the case to the u.s. attorneys office, the district attorneys office and the fbi asking them to investigate me and to investigate my accuser. one of us is committing perjury and the fbi should decide which one is committing perjury and charge that person and thats what ive as...

Thomas jefferson would be saying thats not what the first amendment was intended to protect. you not getting a lot of support and they dont want to support anybody whos attacking and accuser. >> is and also because of your principal position on impeachment. >> no question. i get e-mails every day saying we thought you might be innocent but now that we see are supporting trump we know you have no morality and therefore your guilty, or we hope youre guilty because that will diminish your voice or ...

Officially who his accuser is. im ask you about that when we return. ladies and gentlemen you can watch me most weeknights and join us by calling 844 le vin tv or go to blaze tv.com/mark to sign up. later in the program we will talk about this fascinating book as well that he has written in his own defense. well be right back. ♪ ♪ ♪ the united explorer card hooks me up. getting more for getting away. rewarded! going new places and tasting new flavors. rewarded! traveling lighter. rewarded....

Comparing our country to the soviet union, just want make sure it never becomes anything like that. they said show me the man and i will find you the crime, and thats what some of the democrats are doing pretty have trump in their sites, they want to figure out a way of impeaching him, and they are searching for crime. first they came up with abuse of power. not a crime, not in the constitution but now theyre saying bribery, but theyre making it up. there is no case for bribery based on, even if...

Insurance premiums have skyrocketed, people have canceled events, its as if ive been found guilty of something. ive called for an fbi investigation. i immediately took the case to the u.s. attorneys office, the district attorneys office and the fbi asking them to investigate me and to investigate my accuser. one of us is committing perjury and the fbi should decide which one is committing perjury and charge that person and thats what ive asked have done because there is no process. >> any respon...

President. i think it will be inconceivable that you could have a trial in the senate without the president being able to confront his accuser. >> you are an expert on a lot of the thing youve looked at the history, ive looked at the history, and they were concerned, they were concerned that you could have an out-of-control house. you turn over every two years and they look at the senate and they set up the system. you need to thirds super majority to convict. its gonna be overseen by the chief ...

With me but on seven occasions and places that i never was during the relevant time period. even including in a car in front of my house where she then claims she went into my house where my wife has an office, shes a psychologist, my daughter had an au pair, we had video surveillance, totally made up stories and the question i ask in my book are twofold, how do you protect yourself from false accusations. i was tell myself its can be controversial, you cant get close to lines, dont flirt, dont ...

Professor, does the president have the right to confront his accuser if it goes to trial. >> absolutely. it goes back to the magna carta. theres no concept of due process which doesnt allow an accused to confront their accuser. whether its civil or criminal or political context, you have to be able to confront your accuser. you have to know who your accuser is but we dont believe in anonymous accusations in this country. ultimately the chief justice will have to rule on that because he presides ...

They have ordered that hearsay evidence that are known as gossip is better than direct testimony. they have argued the burden of proof rests with the accused to prove his innocence bought the same time denying permission to testify. they have argued that the right to confront your accuser is an invasion of the accusers privacy. theyve argued that appealing to the courts to defend your constitutional rights as the president has done is ipso facto obstruction of justice and evidence of guilt. they...

And so flimsy, the democrats have had to turn our bill of rights on its head in order to make it. theyve argued that hearsay evidence, better known as gossip, is better than direct testimony. theyve argued that the burden of proof rests with the accused toh prove his innocence. while at the same time, denying the defense witnesses permission to testify. theyve argued that the right to confront yourri accuser is an invasion of the accusers privacy.ac theyve argued that appealing to the courts to ...