Page 180 - Accuser News Today

Appropriate. so he was a very strong witness. and well hear more of him. >> is he john dean? >> you know, he doesnt have the -- he didnt have direct conversations with the president. thats the difference. >> and that is a big difference. >> yes it is. >> you had kfrgconversations wi nixon. >> thank god were recorded. >> and, you know, another thing that you hear republicans saying and complaining about is, this whistle-blower, we need to -- how can this whistle-blowers identity be protected. we ...

Sides to call their witnesses, cross-examine, and lets give the president an opportunity to defend himself. maybe he cant face his accusers on the whistle-blowers, but he can face the accusations and explain them. but in terms of the direct conversation in the transcript, there is no evidence of quid pro quo. and -- and theres -- and president zelensky corroborated that and said i wasnt pressured in any respect. >> congressman, ill let the american people reread the transcript and relisten to mu...

Attacks on president trump and collusion with the democratic national committee. they dont care about that. they are outraged that president trump does. im sorry, this is something the president should follow up on. he should call the ukrainian back and figure out exactly what they are doing about it. >> laura: babar, why is this whistle-blower being kept behind the shroud of secrecy? with what implications? people say that there is a transcript. so why does the whistle-blower matter? why does t...

In america. a very common sense comment. congressman scalise, what is going on here? its only about process. the process does ensure fairness. without a process in place, we have no do process ann the constitution and imagined that out of the window. they all claim to stand on right to confront an accuser, due process, but guys, this is fundamental fairness beingig violated here. oh, you dont care about the substance. we dont know the substance because the substance is being hidden. i think that...

They are outraged that president trump does. im sorry, this is something the president should follow up on. he should call the ukrainian back and figure out exactly what they are doing about it. >> laura: bob barr, why is this whistle-blower being keptti behind the shroud of secrecy? with what implications? people say that there is a transcript. so why does the whistle-blower matter? why does the whistle-blower matter? and now a third instance of bias? >> of course, this is in a whistle-blower. ...

Trashed based on behind-the-scenes testimony, they try him behind closed doors without the ability to confront his accuser and this results in the impeachment article, the process results in an impeachment article. i will move to dismiss in the senate because i think it is illegitimate and unconstitutional. im asking democrats to do is have a transparent process like we did with clinton so the american people can make a decision and not rely on a bunch of democrats. >> democrats blame trump for ...

The process does ensure fairness without a process in place, we have no do process and the constitution and imagined that out of the window. they all claim to stand on right to confront an accuser, due process, but guys, this is fundamental fairness being violated here. oh, you dont care about the substance. we dont know the substance because the substance is being hidden. i think that is what you actually accomplished today. >> laura, they dont want people to know this is actually going on. wha...

Process that i think is very dangerous for the country. instead of the judiciary looking at a potential impeachable offense, theyve created a process in the intel community thats behind closed doors, doesnt provide access to the president accuser. shuts republicans out for all practical purposes, and is not where they substitute for the way you need to do it. it did in the past. lets go to 98. in 1998 in october, we had an impeachment inquiry vote on the floor of the house. i was there. 31 democ...

Intel committee, there injuring people behind closed doors, the president cant confront his end-users, this is a sham. every american should be bothered by what they are doing to president trump and my resolution today calls on the house to embrace the process that was given to president clinton. the ability to call witnesses on your behalf and to ask questions of your accusers and by the way, who is the whistle-blower and what is their bias? yeah, i was fired up because whether you like preside...

New fallout on how they closed a closed-door deposition accusing democrats of denying information to other members of congress. but democrats are blasting the move calling it a stunt. >> they have equal opportunity to ask the questions. there is no limitation on the questions that they ask and no limitations on the members that can be in the room who are on the three committees. >> harris: house republicans calling for the whistle-blower to testify. as fox news has learned of a third unreported ...