Page 208 - Accuser News Today

Hearings, ramirez claims that she and kavanaugh were both freshman at yale in the early 80s when kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a dorm room party. she told "the new yorker" she remembers kavanaugh thrust his penis in her face and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. ramirez admitted she was inebriated and there are gaps in her memory, but said she remembers kavanaugh standing to her right, laughing, pulling up his pants. at the time kavanaugh called it a smear ...

Length a year ago in that there is no evidence whatsoever that its true. none right. >> one of the important parts trading up the chain just the way allegations did last year. looking back to last july, christine blasey ford, the first primary accuser came forward and when she first tried to get the attention of "the washington post" by an encrypted app. they didnt pay attention to her. then she threatened to go to the times. immediately it spread online it spread through a blog the intercept an...

There is no evidence whatsoever that its true. none. >> right one of the important parts trading up the chain just the way allegations did last year. looking back to last july, christine blasey ford, the first primary accuser came forward and when she first tried to get the attention of "the washington post" by an encrypted app, they didnt pay attention to her. then she threatened to go to the times. immediately it spread online it spread through a blog the intercept, an allegation alleging an i...

Brian: "new york times" edit as book that the "new york times" wrote she said she in no word that an important point of the second accuser. the second accuser of brett kavanaugh does not remember the incident. and the lawyer that brought it forward that said he saw it, write him down as a part partisan attorney when he actually worked for bill clinton during the whole impeachment mess. you cannot pretend that stier, this attorney is nonsupport san and doesnt have a horse in this race. you cant p...

He worked as an attorney, and he wasnt present during the impeachment pile. you could say he does have a political buys, based on the facts. the >> katie: you are journalist, harris, very good o. one of the ones who wrote the story was on this morning doing a radio interview. she made the argument that his background is essentially irrelevant to the accusation. brett kavanaugh has in some political work for president bush and was against the -- therefore its the same moral equivalency. she also ...

Ask is i wonder why the mainstream media havent looked further into his accuser. why are they not concerned that leland keyser doubts christine fords story. the eyewitness, someone who is supposed to be one of her best friends that told the fbi she was being pressured by christine fords friend to change her story. reported that christine fords dad congratulated brett kavanaughs dad on confirmation. if you dont have your own dad behind you, that certainly raises questions. >> tucker: it does rais...

On it. the candidates jump on it. it comes to this conclusion that we need to impeach brett kavanaugh and then the newspaper itself admits in effect that the story is a crock, actually. that the supposed victim doesnt remember it. says she is not a victim. isnt it time then to say oh, wow, now i have new information? i guess we cant impeach him. why isnt anyone saying that. >> lets talk about the facts. the victim hasnt spoken to anybody. the people she should have spoken to were the fbi. the wi...

Would do. one thing i would like to ask is i wonder why the mainstream media havent looked further into his accuser. why are they not concerned that leland keyser doubts kristin fords story. someone who is supposed to be one of her best friends that told the fbi she was being pressured by christine blasey fords friend to change her story. dad congratulated brett kavanaughs dad on confirmation. if you dont have your own dad behind you, that certainly raises questions. >> tucker: it does raise som...

It comes to this conclusion that we need to impeach brett kavanaugh and then the newspaper itself admits in effect that the story is a crock, actually. that the supposed victim doesnt remember it. says she is not a victim. isnt it time then to say oh, wow, now i have new information? i guess we cant impeach him. why isnt anyone saying that. >> lets talk about the facts. the victim hasnt spoken to anybody. the people she should have spoken to were the fbi. the witness who senator coons tipped off...

>> even after the new york times had to go back and correct the article we still have the 2020 democrats calling for brett kavanaughs impeachment, pete buttigieg, julian castro, you can see they immediately came out and said we have another allegation, he needs to be impeached and they havent gone back on that. >> ethics are gone. it is clear journalism is on life support. the fact that the new york times jumped on a story they historically would -- there were no sources, the accuser was saying ...