Page 475 - Accusers News Today

About reversal because when you put on pile on evidence that has due process of law, implications, judge oneill was right. you can put some in but not all of it in. i dont think if it goes to retrial, fredricka, were not going to see 13 or 12 or even 10. were going to see maybe 1 or 2 more. but thats about it. >> earlier i spoke with attorney gloria allred who represents several other female accusers of bill cosby. allred is hoping some of them would be allowed to testify when the prosecution re...

Sure they understand whats going on. i have to ask you, gloria, you represent a number of clients. youve been talking to them im sure. what are they saying about this? >> yes, i represent 33 accusers of mr. cosby. you know, one of my clients is at the courthouse this evening, but i have also been chatting with some of the other accusers. everybody is really on edge. it is difficult to go through this very long 12, 14-hour days and, you know, they think it shouldnt be that difficult for the jury ...

Deadlocked. the d.a. says they will proceed and retry. whats next? >> thats right. and they want to do it sooner than later. and the judge said in court that he would like to do it within 120 days. which is, obviously, very soon. and we understand from the prosecutor that theyll have a pretrial conference and that will set the date. this is the judge, steven oneill, thats been assigned to this case so more likely than not he will be the judge to rule at any retrial. from what kevin steele unders...

Has he already announced this morning? okay. well, thats good. sometimes prosecutors wait to know how many jurors have voted for conviction or not. but if hes already said that, then i am very happy because thats important and again, i emphasize that i would like to see a court decide that more prior bad act accusers can testify, because thats relevant on the issue of whether mr. cosby had a plan, a scheme, to drug and sexually assault women. and i think the jury will be better served if they ca...

District attorney? heinously and exploitively ambitious. how do i describe the judge? overtly arrogant, and collaborating with the districts attorney. how do i describe the counsels for the accusers, totally unethical. how do i describe many but not all general media, blatantly vicious entities that continually disseminated intentional omissions of truth for the primary purpose of greedily selling sensationalism at the expense of a human life. >> danny, pretty strong words for judge oneill. the ...

Whether or not he will refile. that is good. sometimes prosecutors wait to know how many jurors voted before conviction or not. if he already said that, then i am very happy because that is important and i emphasize i would like to see a court -- to testify. that is relevant on the issue of whether bill cosby had a plan, a scheme to drug and sexually assault women and the jury will be better served if they can hear from the other accusers and make that decision as to whether or not they could co...

Statute of limitations allowed prosecutors to file three criminal charges of aggravated indecent assault against cosby. after they were provided with new evidence from the unsealing of his 2005 civil deposition. cosby admitted in that sworn testimony to giving quaaludes to women he wanted to have sex with. but quickly changed that answer to only one woman who he said consented to the drug claiming he had misunderstood the question. that civil deposition has come before this jury as well as a fir...

Individually. i also want to thank the supporters who have been here and, please, to the supporters, stay calm, do not argue with people. just keep up the great support. >> how you doing? >> thank you. >> reporter: and there have been some moments where alleged victims, the accusers have verbally gotten into it with bill cosby supporters but, don, all is calm and tomorrow is a brand-new day here in montgomery county at the courthouse. >> get some rest because you will be covering it all. thank y...

District attorney? heinously and exploit ifbly ambitious. how do i describe the judge? overtly arrogant, and collaborating with the district attorney. how do i describe the counsels for the accusers? totally unethical. how do i describe many but not all general media? blatantly vicious entities that continually disseminated intentional omissions of truth for the primary purpose of selling sensationalism at the expense of a human life. historically people have challenged injustices. i am grateful...

Entire court of public opinion and now court of criminal law. but the most poignant moment i heard was from the very first attorney in this case. neither of them talked about him being innocent, the word did not come out of their mouths. they asked the jurors to send a man to prison for that which was not presented by the prosecution. what they are trying to do is number one, not taint a future jury pool although this would be a fine opportunity to say the man is innocent and hasnt done anything...