SFGTV May 17, 2014
If it was previously submitted it clearly shows the potential deck is the same size if not smaller again not correct. Again to the citing the occupant load its not correct if you go to section 10004. 8 in the California Building code it states both outdoors and part of 3 and the individual groups r2 are exempted from the occupant load so the occupant load criteria didnt fit for the outside space. So also the opinion that the project will have a harm physical effect on the appellants property is ...
Source: archive.org