Page 26 - Adjective News Today

Is that correct? >> thats correct. >> and as part of that, of your practice, you were a trial lawyer, correct? >> thats correct. >> successful trial lawyer. >> i dont know about your adjective, but i was -- i guess so, yes, sir. >> did you make millions of dollars in legal fees? >> yes, sir. >> but you wont tell the jury that thats successful? >> if thats the criteria, i was successful. >> you won cases. >> settled cases? >> yes. >> heard your former law partner say that you were a successful la...

>> what was your question? >> you started first with lawson kuhn, correct? >> thats correct. >> then you went to the law firm that doesnt exist anymore because of your activities, is that correct? >> that is correct. >> as part of your practice you were a trial lawyer, correct? >> that is correct. >> successful trial lawyer? >> i dont know about your adjective. i was -- i guess so, yes, sir. >> did you make millions of dollars in legal fees? >> yes, sir. >> you wont tell this jury thats successf...

0 was doing it and i had that document prepared, handwritten in the neatest handwriting that i could make because a secretary other than mine, a paralegal other than mine was going to be the person who was going to put those -- that financial information into the final document. and thats the document that mark ball talked about that he found on my desk whenever it was that he found it. so that is what was going to be, if necessary, what was going to be used thursday. >> the jury has heard about...

0 talked about that he found later in my office. and it was tight -- it was handwritten, ready to be tightened up by, you know -- because of the charges against paw, i kept everything close in the civil case, it was danny in his office that was doing it, and i had that document prepared, handwritten in the neatest handwriting that i could make because a secretary other than mine, a paralegal other than mine was going to be the person who was going to put that financial information into the final...

Ryan would ring me weekly. “are you sure? are you sure?" so it was about then your relationship with your frenemy. i mean, ryan reynolds, you and he loved to tease each other and prank each other, you know, across different sides of the atlantic and wherever you are in the world. whats it really about? yeah. thats a really good question. its sort of a sibling rivalry — me being the older, wiser, smarter, whatever adjective you like thats positive. just all the good ones are for you and all t...

In the history of the world. so they epitomise bias and then they charge anybody who criticises israel with bias. this is classic sleaziness on their part, because if you look at where i was saying it was illegal, it was always a preface, an adjective to a description of the settlements. so it came up in the context of the settlements because a lot of people dont realise that the settlements are a violation of article 49 of the fourth geneva convention. theyre actually war crimes, notjust illega...

Is doing is an interesting point, but, challenge this if you want to, but a group called the un watch, ngo based in geneva, which i think its fair to say, has a pro—israel slant, they analysed 18 months of ken roths personal tweets. they looked at the different countries youd made allegations of illegal behaviour about, and they concluded that 74% of your tweets alleging illegal acts concerning nation states were actually directed at israel. 74% of them. yeah, no, i mean, this is a classic. th...

Of people dont realise that the settlements are a violation of article 49 of the fourth geneva convention. theyre actually war crimes, notjust illegal, you know. so i put that adjective in there and then they say, "oh, well, youre picking on israel," when, you know, there was a reason for that adjective. i didnt need to say, oh, you know, "russian bombardment of cities is illegal." we all know that. i didnt say, you know, need to say that, you know, locking up a gazillion uyghurs is illegal. you...

So it came up in the context of the settlements because a lot of people dont realise that the settlements are a violation of article 49 of the fourth geneva convention. theyre actually war crimes, notjust illegal, you know. so i put that adjective in there and then they say, "oh, well, youre picking on israel," when, you know, there was a reason for that adjective. i didnt need to say, oh, you know, "russian bombardment of cities is illegal." we all know that. i didnt say, you know, need to say ...

In the history of the world. so they epitomise bias and then they charge anybody who criticises israel with bias. this is classic sleaziness on their part, because if you look at where i was saying it was illegal, it was always a preface, an adjective to a description of the settlements. so it came up in the context of the settlements because a lot of people dont realise that the settlements are a violation of article 49 of the fourth geneva convention. theyre actually war crimes, notjust illega...