Page 41 - Adjudication News Today

This crazy thing started paired all of the evidence seems to point to the fbi was out to get the president. that is the investigation. that is the one i think scares all of these people -- >> laura: that is why they have to double down paired i love this come obstruction in plain sight. this is like a new lingo, obstruction in plain sight. she repeated that several times the last couple times. speaking of adam schiff, he was wrestling with the impeachment question today. watch. >> i do think tha...

Because it kind of falls under your purview. this is this story thats been reported this week, president trump floating potential pardons, including one for a navy s.e.a.l. whos about to stand trial for killing civilians in iraq, allegedly. whats your view of a presidential pardon in that case and what would it signal to the troops? >> of course, the president has the right to pardon who he thinks its appropriate to do so. the one cautionary note i have here is, you know, in the chain of command...

Procedure prohibit the disclosure of information presented to a grand jury except as necessary in the course of criminal proceedings, most important, in terms of the american constitutional system of government, is the notion of fundamental fairness for those who after investigation have not been charged with any criminal misconduct. this consideration, he wrote, is particularly important for a special prosecutor whose independence considerably reduces his accountability and who must be unusuall...

>> thank you. democratic house speaker nancy pelosi said impeachment would divide the country and president trump is not word it in her words. and i togethalked to the senior tour at "the atlantic." >> those arent charges that will be largely loud. if the speaker gives her that action, by not using it shes distorting our politics. >> so, david, you say that the voters should decide. 22 months until the next inauguration. if democrats believe and some in the house do, that there could be a cont...

It is changes i hoped to have seen. it is something like jackie spear or any of those types of movements, no. of course the national defense act over the past six years have had changes that have come forward. if we still have women in this instance two are in power and who still feel negatively impacted even to the point of being fearful to present their case for the proper adjudication so that someone receives the proper, you know, whatever they will do to them from the

Freshmen versus the senior leadership members. matt miller, what about the legal issues here, the precedents pretty clear, but if it gets to the courts this would certainly delay their investigations if you have to have adjudication over every subpoena. >> the long and short of it is there is precedent that establishes the relationship between congress and the executive branch. what usually happens is a period of negotiation, if that doesnt work out eventually the courts will decide. i think mos...

To do what was described. >> he has the right, but is what he did right? what is the risk? sir? >> well, i was amused by, you know, her statement that the white house doesnt discuss security clearances. well, they sure discussed it a lot when they were threatening to take away clearances of certain critics. but she is right. the whole clearance process from identifying people that need access to background investigations, to adjudication, to granting a clearance, is a purely executive branch fun...

From white house staff or sitting in a meeting with officials around the world, i think there are very real questions about whether he solely is focused on promoting u.s. national security interest. >> you know the ins and outs of this. the president said he had nothing to do with getting that clearance. whats the protocol? >> if concerns had been raised by investigators and there had been a recommendation to not move forward with jared kushners security clearance process. as we found out with t...

So i want to give you the latest line from the white house. here is what they will explain and not explain. >> we dont discuss security clearances. im not even going to discuss my own. but i will tell you that the president has the absolute right to do what was described. >> he has the right, but is what he did right? what is the risk? sir? >> well, i was amused by, you know, her statement that the white house doesnt discuss security clearances. well, they sure discussed it a lot when they were ...

Report and it may have to go through the court system. im not sure how high but the court system to reach an adjudication on that. what i would emphasis is one of the primary complaints in 2016 was that the fbi director released raw information that they deemed not sufficient to pursue a criminal prosecution. the way our system works is you indict or you remain silent. >> trace: catherine, i want your take on this. it does not mean the mueller report is not coming soon. were saying its not comin...