Page 705 - Administrations News Today

Voted for donald trump in the last presidential election. better than 90% voted for hillary clinton. doug jones, rose to office in alabama on the support of black women. black women candidates, black women voters across this country have made a huge difference. so why not leverage that authority? why not leverage that influence? why not leverage that political power and muscle to the advantage of african-american women who seem to be more progressive, open-minded, more liberal, more willing to t...

Comes up. and i also think that it is a real shame that the partisans. and have been trashed. democratic presidents people like president obama. clinton has been said in 2000 he was invited. he was so busy at that time camp david, trying to get the israelis and the palestinians together in 2000. of course it failed that effect. but he was willing to meet with kim jong-il as well. might actu everybody on board to have a coherent foreign policy and work on steps between administrations. >> it is k...

>> renato, i want you to weigh in. before you do that, i want to remind our viewers of what the president said before and after the election about the at&t/time warner merger. here it is. >> at&t is buying time warner and thus cnn, a deal we will not approve in my administration because its too much concentration of power in the hands of too few. personally, ive always felt that that was a deal thats not good for the country. i think your pricings going to go up. i dont think its a good deal for...

On testing or stopping testing, freeing three hostages, but at saw nothing that he offered. >> the president clearly believes that kim jong-un is preparing and planning to get rid, denuclearize. the regime itting out statements about their portrayal of what is taking place here. they are focusing on what they are saying stopping what they call war games. >> he is at least willing to get a chance and risk diplomatic capital. it is a remarkable step. the president is taking a risk here. i spent th...

Bigger nuclear button. he says those insults were by design. listen to what he told sean hannity -- >> i think without the rhetoric we wouldnt have been here. i believe that. we did sanctions and of the things you would do. other administrations -- i dont want to get specific on that -- butad a p silence. if they saidhing very bad, threatening and horrible, just dont answer. thats not the answer. thats not what you have to do. i think the rhetoric, i hate to do it, sometimes i felt foolish doing...

>> renato, come on, was this always political? >> i would think so. and one thing that surprises me is the just department brought this case using a very, very aggressive unual argument in challenging this merger. and typically republican administrations are not very aggressive in anti-trust enforcement. there are years -- i practiced anti-trust law for many years, so those are years the justice department is less aggressive. so why are they targeting this me while in another context like sincla...

Administrations? >> well, i mean first i think its worth pointing out that even if an agreement doesnt lead to eliminating nuclear weapons, it can still be worth while. so like the 1994 agreed framework, it failed in the end in 2002. but for eight years it did prevent development of new plutonium weapons. but this is far below the standard reached in the past. for example, in 1994, there were international inspectors who were on- at the military complex in north korea. there was a halt to new pr...

Tides of suffering that those communities endured a hes saying we can do something about it and we can move toward a world where black and white people equally share to now. where we have bigotry unleashed, where we have the unvarnished prejudice against vulnerable. what we have to do we the people, we have to come together, we have to foster connections. we have to forge alliances between ourselves. to smak certain that the government is ours. look, we support the government, not an administrat...

Promised what its promised regularly since way back in 1992 which is denuclearization. theres a reason they use that word and not disarmament. denuclearization to them means it starts with the u.s. cutting off south korea from its alliance. and so north korea gave up anything, and, you know, we gave out securities guarantees to north korea. we provided the summit itself and lavish praise to kim jong-un, and we canceled military exercises which are a substantial thing. >> so we gave up a lot. so ...

Administrations. >> it is extraordinary, was not -- the south korean joint training sessions was not discussed apparently with south korea prior to the president talking about it in the conference. >> or with his own national security agency. he spoke to reporters, premature. he underst and lindsey graham says the same thing. it is about south korea security but also about military peace g. as much about china than it is north korea and it changes u.s. power in the region. and one more note on t...