out on a technicality, that virginia giuffre had released all potential defendants for many lawsuit for the rest of time. the court has said that s not the right interpretation or that is not necessarily the right interpretation of a 2009 settlement and therefore that the case must go ahead. he is basically saying there is a case to answer here. here saying that he retracts prince andrew s lawyers contention that there is only one way to read this 2009 settlement and that one way is that prince andrew is released from all liability. thejudge has said clearly in the sort of that there are at least two interpretations of that settlement and what he says is that settlement and what he says is that virginia giuffre s interpretation of that settlement, which is much narrower, is also a possible interpretation. so what he s saying is that we need to go to trial, we need to understand, we need to have the argument about exactly what the settlement means and that he is notjust going to
Transcripts for BBCNEWS BBC News 20220112 15:00:30
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the case dismissed having failed, andrew s options amounts to this. he can settle out of court. they would be no admission of liability but he would pay a substantial sum. he can default, ignore the court case and by default they would be a finding against him. finally, he could fight it out in court. he d have to give a deposition in the roath, the rival stories would be tested, the matter would be decided in open court. lawyers who have been following the case say none of the options will be attractive to him. case say none of the options will be attractive to him. andrew has got no aood attractive to him. andrew has got no good options attractive to him. andrew has got no good options now. attractive to him. andrew has got no good options now. he attractive to him. andrew has got no good options now. he can t - attractive to him. andrew has got no good options now. he can t make . good options now. he can t make things good options now. he can t make things better so essenti
andrew took advantage of her on those occasions, charges he strongly denies. this will be his chance to clear his name as well as her chance to prove her allegations. and it is now confirmed he will have to give testimony in open court in new york in a civil case. it ages testimony in open court in new york in a civil case. i in a civil case. it yes and no. he will probably in a civil case. it yes and no. he will probably not in a civil case. it yes and no. he will probably not want - in a civil case. it yes and no. he will probably not want that - in a civil case. it yes and no. he will probably not want that to i will probably not want that to happen. there is a way in which the court in new york can seek the high court in london s approval to require him to give testimony. it will be on oath. it cannot be directly done, it cannot be forced to go to america to give testimony but can be required to give evidence in london if the court in london approves that. the high court would
you paid her $500,000 or £371,000 to end her claim. she is suing the duke of york in a civil case for allegedly sexually assaulting her 20 years ago when she was just a teenager. he has consistently denied the claims. the document was raised released ahead of that critical hearing that has taken place today in the civil case involving prince andrew and the interpretation of that settlement will form essential plank of the argument between the two sides. ajudge in new york has rejected that attempt by prince andrew to have the lawsuit accusing him of sexual assault thrown out. it now means that prince andrew will face a civil trial in the united states. his accuser alleges that prince andrew s friends, jeffrey epstein and ghislaine maxwell, lent her out the six was wealthy and
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.