Page 124 - Adoptions News Today

Been wrong, too. but its clear if you read those e-mails in the proper order, and when donald trump jr. released them he did it in reverse order so its hard to follow. but if you read "the new york times" it had it in the correct order. and it makes it very clear this is not about adoptions, it is about getting opposition research that will help hillary clinton and hurt donald trump in becoming president. >> our very great chicago counsel. well have another break and be right back after this. ch...

Evil of putin could be so cle clearly infiltrating washington. >> when you hear donald trump jr. met with a lawyer who has lobbied for the overturning of the the magnitsky act and they talked about adoptions, what do you hear when you hear that set of facts? >> the first thing my reaction is that nobody -- there wasnt a single person in the room talking about adoptions. it doesnt surprise me these people showed up in trump tower because putin has been trying every different tactic he can to try ...

Is saying now, using recall or not addressing the question in the way you and i might understand it. so, you know, there are so many pieces of this puzzle to put together. some of this, before we even get to the question of if theres criminal actions that have been taken, is just this one part, showing how hard it is to understand. also, there are other conversations on the way to sanctions that people could have. as we know from the famous june meeting in trump tower, where trump says the conve...

Is it fair to bring up where lawyers have given their political dollars? >> bill clinton attacked some of the lawyers on ken starrs team, at the end of the day, the facts are facts. i think donald trump has given more to democrats than all of muellers lawyers. trump was a very generous donor, he was to a bunch of democrats, including hillary clinton if im not mistaken. i come back to the air force one. think about that for a minute, flying back from the summit and donald trumps there and says i ...

Meeting, donald trump jr. says we didnt waste 20 minutes and talking about russian adoptions, thats not against the law. so why the deep, why the such a great determination to keep arms length? >> thank you so much. all of you. you can read the entire cnn report or not mueller investigation following the money and more on cnn.com. president trump called the reports that he had a very testy call with the australian prime minister fox news, but the transcripts indicate that the only fake thing i...

President was not involved in the crafting of that statement saying the meeting was about russian adoptions. the reason it matters is this. as they talk about this investigation, as the investigators look into whether there was any collusion between the trump campaign and russia, we still dont know that yet but they are investigating that, they will look at this meeting. was there a coverup of any kind. was he trying to obstruct justice in any way. we dont know that yet. important to keep that i...

>> let me help my colleagues to the right on me, both on this panel and literally, attempt to unravel this pretzel. this is something weve seen from this white house periodically. the white house lies, then the facts come out, then the white house tells you dont worry about facts. what we know to be the truth is that this meeting was not about adoptions or russian adoptions. we also know that the president dictated that statement. what did we deduce from that? that the president lied. he lied an...

This comes along? >> brian, it merits repetition. that meeting back in june 2016 was direct evidence that the trump campaign knew in advance before attending the meeting that the russian government was attempting to interfere in the 2016 election. and by participating in that meeting at the highest levels of the trump campaign that is leading mueller to look at whether there was foreknowledge that the campaign willingly participated and in fact agreed to attend the meeting and agreed to discuss ...

>> the issue here -- there are a lot of issues. john touched on one. fundamentally sarah huckabee sanders said yesterday is a direct contradiction to what the white house has been saying. number two, remember the trump white house, jay sekulow and donald trump essentially said, look, i dont know anything about this. i was clueless about this meeting. i wasnt there, didnt know anything about it. they now say he weighed in. thats a tough term to figure out. what does weighed in mean? does it mean ...

To lie about it just shows that he is covering his tracks. the fact that adoptions were discussed at that meeting doesnt renderer his explanation truthful. as we all know 99% of the truth is 100% a lie. >> a subset of what you were talking about about clients discussing a case, is the skm as we talked about at the top of the broadcast, walling off the president. the per juror active is plausible deny ability. call it what you want. but the protective barrier so the president is not in the know. ...