Page 3 - Adverbs News Today

lawsuits. that is going to do it for me. "deadline: white house" starts right now. hi there, everyone. happy wednesday and happy juneteenth, it is 4:00 in the heeft. there might be only one thing more alarming than what has become near medieval siege on ow countrys tradition of respect for the rule of law. and it is the fact that many americans regrettably but understandably have after all of these years of trump and his allies attacking it, grown numb to it or view it as a new norm....

Adjectives and adverbs and rhetoric and focus on facts. that is what happens in a courtroom. im less concerned about donald trump and what the defendant says. donald trump is a defendant who has been convicted, unlike most defendants who have been convicted, they said the process was unfair and they disagree with it. that is what defendants do. he happens to unfortunately be the candidate for the republican party, but the real issue is the one that you focused on, which is the enablers. the idea...

We dont know with impact of all this rhetoric is. people watching and listening and thinking its a license to do something to do harm. and its like a redux of 2020, to me. talk to me about your concerns here and what you hear when you cure the attacks on the jug on the judge and the jurors. >> what i would ask people to do is to look past the adjectives and adverbs and rhetoric and focus on the facts. this is what happens in a courtroom. im less concerned about trump and what a defendant says. h...

You need to have the facts. adjectives and adverbs is not a way of arguing, especially for someone who has been the leader of the free world, let alone anyone else. and i think thats really important. -- somehow i am jack smiths boss, again, where are the facts of that? i have had zero communications with jack smith or his team. they are independent both within the department of justice and certainly for a legal analyst on msnbc. >> well, that is a very disciplined and graceful response. totally...

Friends of the court briefs where this was raised by one of the friends of the court. in a brief about whether the state -- bring this up now. so stay tuned for the discussion on tuesday about that issue. >> a big thing to watch, it sounds like. okay, andrea, i cant let you go without asking, because im sure you saw the former president called you jack smiths slime ball boss. anyone who knows you things thats insane, or anyone who watches you. but i wanted to give you an opportunity to respond t...

To talk about that on tuesday. they actually issued an order to the party is saying, please come prepared to talk about a variety of issues that were raised by friends of the court briefs, where this was raised by one of the friends of the court. in a brief about whether this state should be in effect. whether theyre allowed to bring this up now. so stay tuned for the discussion on tuesday about that issue. >> thats an interesting -- a big thing to watch, it sounds like. okay, now, andrew, i hav...

Not legal argument. that is not a factual arguments. anymore than if you say the election was stolen. you need to have facts, adjectives and adverbs is not a way of arguing, especially for someone who has been the leader of the free world, let alone anyone else. and i think thats really important on the substance which is to suggest that somehow i am jack smiths boss. again, where are the facts of that? ive had zero communications with jack smith or his team. they are independents, both within t...

Pretty significant, and it was a press presence outside the courthouse like i have never seen before. >> fascinating stuff. lets come back to the table here, andrew. lets go through the things that, you know, a lot of times, how unusual some of these things were. the fact that a trial date was set, it was discussed, is that normal for this kind of hearing? >> no. to have -- this is as glenn said, usually a pretty pro forma thing. i was, to glenns point, i had the exact same reaction. obviously, ...

Theres a ddirth of facts. >> you know whats not in here? what did he do or not do? this is a classic donald trump where adjectives and adverbs replace discussion of facts. he is likely to be the co-conspirator and the person who made false statements. >> this is where legal analysis melds with literary analysis. thanks to all. coming up, what we know about the reported charges of espionage and how national security may have been impacted. thats next on special coverage of the indictment of don...

Does the press do. if you listen to george santos, if you listen to donald trump, they have adjectives. they have adverbs, they have epithets. we -- one of the things we can do better is george santos could say im going to prove acts, or innocent. but what are the facts? what is it that makes these allegations erroneous? presumably, he knows. >> he hasnt shared any of that yet. >> exactly. these snippets are fine. but one of the ways to sort of get at this is to really say, okay, lets go through...