Page 47 - Affirmative News Today

The bar association. >> state his point of order not a speech. >> how are we supposed to process over 8,000 pages of documents that came from various committees -- >> that is not a point of order. that is not a point of order. >> mr. chairman, will you give us an explanation of why you gave us documents -- >> gentleman will suspend and not make a speech. please rise and raise your right hand. do you swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony youre about to give is true and corre...

Association. how are we supposed to process over 8,000 pages of documents that came from various committees within 48 hours. >> that is not a point of order. >> is there a reason why this document >> the gentleman will suspend and not make a speech. mr. goldman and mr. castor, please rise and raise your right hand. do you swear or affirm under penalty of perjury the testimony you are about to give is true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information and belief so help you god. let the ...

Court of law, you would be facing sanctions right now by the bar association. >> the gentleman will state his point of order. >> how aree we supposed to process over 8,000 pages of documents that came from various committees -- >> that is not a point of order. i will now proceed with the oath. the gentleman willth suspend an not makell a speech. mr. goldman, mr. castor, please rise and raise your right hand., >> do you wear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony youre about to giv...

The constitution is about free and fair elections and not about winning the election and trump is trying to use our foreign military intermonies support for his own personal gain, and this is against the constitution, and what the founding fathers feared most. this is an urgent time, because the election is upon us. >> last question to you, sir. you speak about the clarity of ukraine and yet you talk about the inclusion of the mueller report, and it only takes one article of impeachment to be vo...

Reporting shes been taking the measure of the caucus. >> the question is whether they include anything outside the ukraine investigation. do they keep this narrow or say theres a pattern of behavior? the president did this call the day after mueller testified on capitol hill and some people said the mueller report included a road map for impeachment on obstruction. i think thats a big question. i dont think its going to be answered in the affirmative, but its one of the big decisions that she an...

The best of your knowledge, information and belief, so help you god? let the record show the witnesses answered in the affirmative. thank you and please be seated. please note that each of your written statements will be entered into the record in its entirety. accordingly, i ask that you summarize your testimony in ten minutes. to help you stay within that time, there is a timing light on your table. when the light switches from green to yellow, you have one minute to conclude your testimony. w...

Of your knowledge, information and belief so help you god? let the record show the witnesses answered in the affirmative. thank you and please be seated. please note that each of your written statements will be entered into the record in its entirety. i ask that you summarize your testimony in 10 minutes. to help you stay within that time there is a timing light on your table. when the light switches from green to yellow you have one minute to conclude your testimony. when the light turns read i...

Testimony you are about to give is true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information and belief, so help you god? let the record show the witnesses answered in the affirmative. thank you and please be seated. please dont that each of your written statements will be entered into the record in its entirety. accordingly, i ask that you summarize your testimony in ten minutes. to help you stay within that time, there is a timing light on your table. when the light switches from green to ye...

Thats sort of a what we often call tears iers of scrutiny in constitutional law. if that were to be replaced with a purely historical test, that would be a big change because weve seen almost 1,500 second amendment cases in the last ten years. almost all of them adopting some version of that two-part framework. and if the justices replace it, then were looking at a very different world. >> so one of the interesting things that -- that pete brought up earlier today is that this concept in this pa...

Your point, ross. listen to the explanation. >> why are we doing this on a normal 3-1 ratio? if its so important like we did in clinton where we had almost four times as many of these witnesses, why dont we at least get 2 for 2? why dont we at least have more witnesses in the process? if the judiciary committee simply has a constitutional scholar hearing and then they have a presentation of a report by adam schiff and we go straight to a markup, that is a failure on chairman nadler of the ultima...