Page 28 - Affirmatively News Today

Can you say affirmatively that whenever the president says something, we can trust it to be real? >> if hes not joking, of course. every time he speaks authoritatively, that he speaks, he is speaking as president of the united states. >> the credibility of the president, the role of the press. we have a special panel. we continue turning back to gay talese and floyd abrams here. is this different, in all of the different press that you have covered and you have basically represented the press, t...

Exposed this and the rest is history. you can, you know, say that the left pushed the story, but there was so much more to it than any one side pushing the story. >> paul, you wrote that one of the first companies to pull its ad ads is returning to the time slot. so all the talk about the fox brand being bicker than bill oreilly. is there any sense that more advertisers will start to come back, as you were just saying that this will not go away but die down? >> i think the media attention has a ...

Affirmatively. youd think youd want to get your bad cop statement out there and have the president follow up. i dont know. in a sense it doesnt matter. ultimately what people are looking for is what the president says and important as the state department is, the auth authoritative voice is the presidents. and the fact that they chose not to show the irregularities, that speaks volumes. >> there are those who believe this president sort of has a pension for strongman for overseas, whether its cc...

People on the democratic side perceived and repeal and replace is about taking away obama signature achievement and affirmatively, what did they want to do? republicans have spent the last 30, 40 years of trying to replace this image of callousness toward the poor and callousness toward the elderly with the idea of compassionate conservatism. that was whisked away and there was a cruelty to this bill that was even apparent to conservative voters and republican voters who were shocked at the crue...

Senate. i dont know if republicans were mentally prepared if they cared about it so much to expend that kind of political capital and to know, okay, precisely because theyre doing something unprecedented and taking away an entitlement. we might lose the house and the senate for doing this. do they care that much? im not sure. >> it was a regulatory process, and i thought the graphic you put up the number of llegislatie days devoted to previous legislate, where your time is spent thats where your...

People on the democratic side perceived and repeal and replace is about taking away obama signature achievement and affirmatively, what did they want to do? republicans have spent the last 30, 40 years of trying to replace this image of callousness toward the poor and callousness toward the elderly with the idea of compassionate conservatism. that was whisked away and there was a cruelty to this bill that was even apparent to conservative voters and republican voters who were shocked at the crue...

Then. the president used the word wiretap to mean broadly surveillance and other activities. >> can you say affirmatively, whenever the president sends something, we can trust it to be real? >> if hes not joking, of course. in that case. no, no, youre asking -- no, no, youre point is, every time that he speaks hes speaking as president of the united states. that its -- >> more than 3 million americans voted illegally. is he jokes or does he believe that? >> he does believe it. >> selena, where -...

Again, ill refer you to the cbo itself. the number they issued that would be insured in 2016 was 26 million people. the actual number is 10 -- excuse me, 24 million. the actual number is 10.4. thats not a question of our credibility. its a question of theirs. >> reporter: can you say affirmatively that whenever the president says something, we can trust it to be real? >> if hes not joking, of course. every time he speaks authoritatively, that he speaks, hes speaking as president of the united st...

Youre asking and the way you do the analysis of whos actually in the workforce. the number of people who are working and receiving a paycheck is a number we can look at. secondly, when youre asking about the validity of the cbo report. again, i refer to you the cbo itself. the number they issued that would be insured in 2016 was 26 million people. the actual number is 10 -- excuse me, 24 million. the actual number is 10.4. thats not a question of our credibility. its a question of theirs. do you...

Report. again, i refer to you the cbo itself. the number they issued that would be insured in 2016 was 26 million people. the actual number is 10 -- excuse me, 24 million. the actual number is 10.4. thats not a question of our credibility. its a question of theirs. do you have any more? >> reporter: you have not answered this. >> i have answered. >> reporter: can you say affirmatively, whenever the president says, we can trust it to be real? >> if hes not joking, of course. but in that case -- h...