mar-a-lago. bill: republicans launching multiple investigations into the mishandling of classified records. jim jordan accusing the administration of a double standard. here is what he told fox quote, why was president trump s home raided but not president biden s? why did the f.b.i. take pictures of president s trumps so-called classified document but not president biden s? republicans want fair and equal treatment under the law, end quote. here in turn is house majority leader steve scalise on the topic. you look at the 60 minutes interview joe biden did and the comments he made about former president trump having documents. he made the comments knowing that he mims had classified documents sitting in his garage. he will find out the rules apply to him and we ll finally start asking questions that haven t been asked for the last few years. dana: the secret service claims there are no visitor logs for president biden s home showing who may have had access to classified
but saaber s job is to deal with problems like this. the president s personal attorney is a man he has known for years named bob bauer and married to white house advisor anita dunn. she was working for the white house and left for a time and then came back because the president wanted her back in the mix when it comes to a communication strategy to the public. what is confusing, bill and dana, is the security clearance aspect of this developing case. one that seems to develop by the hour. who had security clearances and who was going through the documents? the short answer we don t know by name who went through every document but we do know some did not have security clearances to be even looking in the first place. saaber put out a statement saying the president s personal attorneys conducting the searches do not have active security clearances. so if they identified a document with a classified marking, they stopped and did not review it. suspended any further search in
to where the classified documents were found. again, is that true? trump says they told him to put a padlock on and he did that. answer that from a legal perspective. that s when i reach that point that s when i got off this train. this was going nowhere. the problem is that the mar-a-lago documents were held in a storage room that the f.b.i. stipulated additional security for. it was an area protected by the secret service. had camera surveillance. even though it is not a secure location for classified documents. i don t believe classified documents should ever have been taken there. that compareson works against president biden. there is no comparison between that storage room and keeping documents next to your corvette in the garage. i have no idea why they would want to raise that comparison. bill: it s been raised. dana: it is now raised.
supervisors. and the frightening thing is when i spoke to people about it last night, a lot of people thought oh, this will never pass. i did a head count on the board of supervisors. we have 11. they only need six votes. i think they have a solid five right now. there is a good chance this could be presented to the mayor for her signature. bill: how many on that board? 11. the president supports the propose all given to him from this reparations committee. you have to be 18 years of age, must have identified as black or african-american on public documents for at least ten years. then you have to prove at least 2 of 8 additional criteria of which they include born in san francisco between 1940 and 1996, proof of residency in san francisco for at least 13 years, personally or the direct descendant of someone incarcerated by the failed war on drugs.
hill. bill: as questions swirl over how and why the documents were found at his home in delaware and d.c. office building. numerous attorneys appear to be involved in the growing scandal. the white house has yet to explain what their roles are. the justice department, as the story moves on, david spunt. i wish we had more answers about specifically who was handling these documents. a handful of attorneys, though, officials being a little coy about who they specifically are. add the fact the special counsel robert hur is investigating and information seems to be in a black hole right now. we do know richard saaber is the white house special counsel. his name has come up several times over the past week. he was brought onto the team last spring to deal with controversial investigations. he is not officially the white house counsel. that title belongs to a man named stewart.