Street skaep workcape work theyre awesome to collaborate with, we need them in our community thank you. Thank you. Thank you. My name is ray bobit, from sf clubs, we operate 715 harrison, which houses city nights and cityscape pizza. We are one of the store fronts, we have been there 28 years i have been there 26 years. The transformation of the area is amazing. As you well know beyond the residential expansion, we still have Small Businesses that have been there several years shg including our own. What the ybcbd has done is created a circumstances we have Immediate Service to beautify our neighborhood the clean to address issues of sidewalks and store fronts the Police Officer that they have year round, deals with aggressive street behavior. All of their residential people that come around and work directly with the community its amazing. Im kind of choked up about it because the cbd has been so amazing, and had such an impact on our community, i want you to understand we want the re
5th. 5th and mission on the northwest corner. That doesnt seemed to be included. That was not included on the original boundaries i know that. With establishing these new boundaries, and establishing i just want to understand that that wasnt included if you can give me details around that. I cant tell you why its not original included not necessarily originally included it has not been opened until recently but why it was not considered included. Its part of Central Market we were not going to poach any properties off Central Market, no one approached us we want to be a part of yerba buena, since it had been a historic part of cbd we didnt approach it. It looks like you are trying to keep it central to yerba buena which is seems to be the reason for maybe establishing the current boundaries mormasconi yerba buena, can you provide more detail as to how the boundaries were established. Im just trying to understand. We had a lot of conversations about the boundaries as i mentioned were th
Rehabilitation and Maintenance Plans are included in the packet. Despite the lengthy process the owners have been ideal and working with the Planning Department to meticulously restore the upon property. The Planning Department recommends approval of this contract in conformance with the unanimous recommendation of approval this year. The application rehabilitation and Maintenance Program is consistent with the requirements of the mills act. I am available to answer any questions about the application and the program and a representative from the Assessors Office can answer questions about the reevaluation. Okay. Good afternoon supervisors. Trisha on behalf of the assessors records office. I would like to thank you for the opportunity to address you today. I am here with my colleague who can address specific questions. Before i turn it over to mike i want to acknowledge the hard work of mr. Stein and mr. Peeps and for their understanding and commitment to Historic Preservation i want t
Okay. Much appreciated. We dont have a budget Analyst Report so we will move to Public Comment. No Public Comment so its closed. Colleagues, can i have a motion to approve these items . Mr. Chairman i believe there is a need to amend the title. Okay. Actually chairman farrell can i ask a question . Please supervisor mar. I know in my conversations with the city administrator there have been discussions whether this project move forward like a private Public Partnership like dial drive project and other approaches and i am wonderings if you could talk about that. [inaudible] construction project by the federal highway bridge program. Just to speak to the amendment to the title of the item as well. The original title to the item cited a project combined value for the project of just over 50 million. That was referencing the peak annual reimbursement under underneath the construction moa and not the aggregate for the moa and for the rightofway and the combined value as presented in the am
Should be closer to 1. 1 million instead of 1 million and impact to the city of 6,000 versus 7,000. I did note that we consulted with the City Attorney and noted this lower estimate is not substantive and would not require a continuance and now i would like to turn it over to michael who will address the General Mills act process and for the corrected estimate rational. Thank you trisha and good afternoon chair farrell and supervisors. I am here to speak on the general process the Assessors Office goes through evaluating a mills act property. I can speak on the specific evaluation for buchanan street. For all of properties we are to do this and what is the facta [inaudible] value and the original Purchase Price and the inflation factor added each year and then a market value of the property. By looking at sales in the area we look at what could the property sell for at that time and this is a mills act value and proscribed by state law. The code says the rate that we should be using th