our country. this is the same man that said he would save our country. what happens when people who are supposed to cure the conflict of interest have even greater conflict of interests than those they replace? that s not a rhetorical question. you nor i nor anyone else would ever sit peter strzok on a jury. we wouldn t have him objectively dispassionately investigate anything knowing what we know now. why didn t we know what it ahead of time and my last question, my final question to you and i appreciate the chairman s papers. how would you help me answer that question when i go back to south carolina this week? congressman, first of all, with regard to the special counsel, mr. strzok was already working on the investigation when the special counsel appointed. the appointment i my was robert mueller. what i would recommend you tell your constituents is robert miller and rod
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20171213:17:00:00
vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
counsel as a heroic figure who served his country, a career prosecutor. someone who was confirmed unanimously as fbi director. someone of patriotism. i. will stake it your judgment on mr. conner last not changed today. correct? you would not have employed mr. muller if you thought i would be engaged. you agree with the president s labeling of the special counsel s investigation as a witch-hunt i assume. i don t know exactly what the president meant by that, congressman. the special counsel s investigation is not a witch-hunt. it s not a witch-hunt. the president said it you disagree. you are supposed to be independent. you can answer a question contrasting with the president. i do not mean wha i don t knw what the president meant. do you believe the repeated attacks on special counsel robert mueller by pundits on tv or colleagues in congress threatens to undermine the credibility of
prosecutors would think was good and obviously the supreme court. the russia investigation, who started it? who was the agent? was it strzok who started it? who opened the case? congressman, that matter is under review by the intelligence committee. there is nothing i can talk about about the initiation of the investigation. i can assure you we will provide appropriate access to the intelligence committee. did the fbi pay for the dossier? i m not in a position to answer the question. do you know the answer to the question? i believe i know the answer but the intelligence committee is the appropriate committee to make 245. that is not true. we have oversight over your department and the fbi. and whether public funds were spent on a dossier, that something that s classified. we have every right to that information. you should provide it. if you are not, then there will probably be was that info used to get surveillance over anybody associated with trump? i appreciate th
integrity and your commitment to protecting the independence of the special counsel to reaffirm our commitment to the rule of law. so when you said just a moment ago that you don t have an opinion about a loyalty oath from the president, being asked of people, it might be useful to remind you, sir, that members of the department of justice take an oath to the constitution. and so a loyalty oath to the president of the united states is inappropriate for any president to ask for and for anyone to swear it. do you agree? congressman, nobody has asked me for a loyalty oath. that s not my question, sir. my question is, you are here to demonstrate the independence of your office. and you are unwilling to say that an oath to the president of the united states rather than to the constitution is not inappropriate? does that not incite a lot of the confidence. an oath to the president of the united states rather than the constitution would be inappropriate. an oath to the president of th
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.