south carolina. the president just a little while ago says it was always his plan to take it out. we made it clear to china what we were going to do. they understand our position. we will not back off. we did the right thing. has it always been your view to shoot down a chinese spy balloon or only because it became public? oh, no it was always my position. once it came to the united states from canada i told them i wanted to shoot it down as soon as appropriate. they concluded, they concluded we should not shoot it down over land. they are not a serious threat and we should wait. greg: clearly this is his finest moment since corn pop. part of this scooped up and sent over to the fbi for further analysis and despite assuring the american people there was no threat the senior u.s. official says there may have been self detonating explosives off of the vessel. just like jessie s hair appeared republicans are reacting with usual pouncing. the message they were trying to
accountability itself. downplaying of what happen is an insult to servicemembers sitting here and throughout the united states of america. the biden administration inherited a chaotic withdrawal already in progress. on the day the biden administration began 5000 taliban prisoners had been released, american forces had been reduced to 2500. come the commander-in-chief makes a decision, is that their decision or the previous administration s decision? when the commander-in-chief makes a decision, it is his decision, can t base it on anybodiel, accountability is thea the top. todd: lucas tomlinson has more. lucas. lucas: many are calling for president biden to take responsibility for the withdrawal from afghanistan. the president said it would not look like this. in a memo crafted by the white house, it laid blame on former president donald trump. the outgoing administration provided no plans for how to conduct theifiable withdrawal or how to some who served are sp
british prime minister, liz truss, has defended her government s chaos, and a sharp drop in the value of the pound. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me arejessica elgot, deputy political editor at the guardian and emma wolf an author and journalist. we usually start with newspaper front pages, but the economist magazine s cover is so eye catching, we thought we d kick off with it: under a banner of how not to run a country it shows liz truss and kwasi kwarteng in a sinking rowing boat named great britain . the i newspaper continues the theme with the banner: tories fear wipe out after three weeks of truss as pm, also highlighting the yougov poll which they suggest shows more than half of voters would back the opposition in a general election. the times picks up with new bad news. the daily mail echoes the sentiment trust i am not for turning. the guardian looks ahead to tomorrow s meeting between liz truss and br
There has been much in the papers lately about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence and the real danger of natural stupidity, mainly in politics, especially with a well-known example in the US. What would happen if we combined them? Politicians could be replaced by robots using AI. They would probably make more sensible choices, more quickly and without the need for expensive committee reviews.
Uber Eats is bringing autonomous food delivery robots to the streets of Tokyo next month in partnership with Cartken and Mitsubishi Electric. Find out how these AI robots will revolutionize food delivery in Tokyo.