Page 65 - Aiding News Today

Cuellar, a democrat who has been encouraging the biden administration to do something. they wont listen to the polls. do they just not care or is their larger mission more important? >> yeah, the larger mission is to import their future voters. they know they are losing with the american people so they want to pad their voting block. thats been my theory for years now. the biden administration is not going to change their policy. thats clear. its going to be up to governors both republican and d...

Guard at that store and you see these guys trying to come in and -- and starting to work on breaking into the store, and you decide to take a two-hour coffee break, you, too, could be held liable for aiding and abetting whatever they steal -- whatever stealing or crimes they commit inside the store. and thats the big danger for donald trump. that he -- you know, he was -- he was there. he took -- he took the long five hour coffee break in effect on january 6th and did nothing. and what was going...

From their op-ed this quote. we, all of us, former senior military officials, are increasingly concerned about the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election and the potential for lethal chaos inside our military, which would put all americans at severe risk. in short, we are chilled to our bones at the thought of a coup succeeding next time. lets bring in executive editor for defense 1. kevin, you know, we see terrifying things that chill us to our bones about the possibility of another coup h...

That were committed. liz cheney was very precise, clearly channeling a decision of a trump appointee, judge dab any friedrick from last week. she essentially quoted from 18 u.s. code section 1512 which makes it a federal crime for anyone corruptly to obstruct or impede, whether by action or inaction an official proceeding, and she held, dabney friedrick held in a prosecution brought by the justice department against some foot soldiers that an official proceeding includes what congress has to do ...

New from last week. see how she essentially quoted a section from 15 12, which makes it a federal crime for anyone to corruptly obstruct or impede, whether by action or inaction, an official proceeding and she held them in prosecution brought by the justice. that is one of many federal crimes that are involved. another is the federal crime of aiding and giving comfort to an insurrection. which is clearly what happened on january six. and what we have is an avalanche of information about

Might or might not be relevant. but remember, this notion that the vice president could simply toss out electoral votes was already being pushed at the time by the former president himself. he was already leaning on mike pence in private and on social media. so, its hard to imagine the congressman jordans text by the 5th of january was all that new to the chief of staff. but it is remarkable that a sitting member of congress was texting this bunk to aid in the attempted undermining of a free and...

Jordan. the one who downplays the insurrection and defends the big election lie. the result of the message cites federalist paper 78 and a federal case from 1915, which might or might not be relevant. but remember, this notion that the vice president could simply toss out electoral votes was already being pushed at the time by the former president himself. he was already leaning on mike pence in private and on social media. so, its hard to imagine the congressman jordans text by the 5th of janua...

>> i think youre absolutely right, michael, and i think that is the big question that now lingers over this committee. who are those members of congress that were in contact with mark meadows, not only on january 6, the members of congress that were pleading with him to try and get the president to do something to call off his supporters and quell the violence here on capitol hill, but also those lawmakers that were in conversation and communication with mark meadows in the days and weeks leadin...

Were in conversation and communication with mark meadows in the days and weeks leading up to january 6 after the november election that were aiding and abetting this attempt to stymie the democratic process, to try to stop the event of electoral votes. what we saw tonight was an outline of texts that did both of those things, right, a group of texts that showed people in communication with mark meadows trying to undermine the election results, and then a second set of text messages trying to pre...

To highlight here is how do we protect that this doesnt happen again? and thats why this piece becomes important. producing alternate slade slate electors if they werent successful this time, what would prevent them unless we highlight this, unless we talk about this, from doing this again? >> you keep mentioning the public reporting here. this is something else that i heard from people who have been around the committee, that a lot -- a lot of what youre looking at is the public reporting, what...