finally the votes. you can find that in bookstores not line right now. that is all in on tuesday night, all in starts right. now the body doubles are happening before any of the trials actually begun, which is the staggering part about all of this it s the ice beneath the water line. in terms of what this means for all the people that interact with it. this is happening to all of them. it s what it means to be holding up democracy in this day and age. you have to be prepared for a late night cell phone calls, threatening your family. thank you my friend. and thank you for joining us this hour. the matchup of the years set. it s a rematch of 2020. it s the same teams. it s the red team, versus the other red team. that is right. kansas city chiefs are set it s super bowl 58. okay. all right. if you thought that was a wind up to the lightly battle between president biden and donald trump in 2024. it is also that to. and that is because, bear with me here, a segment of ri
arguments used by donald trump to fend off the cases popping up cross the country challenging his place in the 2024 ballot. it is an existential threat to the one thing that donald trump sees as the way out of all his legal problems, winning the presidency. a brand-new brief to the supreme court alongside other prominent lawyers like george conway, michael luttig calls for the justices to take the 14th amendment very literally. they say, quote, because section 3 emerged from the hallowed ground of the civil war, this court must accord section 3 its fair meaning, not a narrow construction. mr. trump incited and therefore engaged in an armed insurrection against the constitution s express and foundational mandates that require the peaceful transfer of executive power to a newly elected president. in doing so mr. trump disqualified himself under section 3. regarding trump s argument the so-called insurrectionist ban can only be applied after a candidate is elected, luttig and
members of the house will be getting back to work this week, but a major priority right now is wrangling with the details of a potential bill to deal with the border, and aid to ukraine. last night president biden reiterated his support for legislation that would give him the authority to shut down the border if it becomes overwhelmed. also last night, donald trump said he would rather have no border deal than a bad one. so had much support is the current legislation garnering in the congress? joining us now is nanette california, she is the chair of the congressional hispanic caucus. welcome to you congressman have you seen any text, legislative text, of this potential border security bill? not a single word. we don t know what s in the details. we only know what is reported, we only know vaguely what the white house shared, but no text at all. there s really no way to say whether it s fantastic in great, as we re hearing some people say, and we don t know how bad it
about another situation, like a job interview, so someone just being like, there is one more thing i m facing 91 counts. i mean, anyway. we ll figure it out. yeah. thank you. thank you to you at home for joining us this hour. if you are a person that doesn t think a convicted felon should be running the country, you might think of this statistic as a glass half empty kind of number. an exit polling conducted by nbc yesterday, 54% of new hampshire s republican primary voters said that if donald trump to be convicted of a crime, they would still consider him fit to be president. don t get me wrong, that is not a sign of a healthy democracy. the majority of new hampshire s republican primary voters would not care if trump ends up a convicted felon. by the way, that would also mean that donald trump, a florida resident, would not be able to vote for himself as a convicted felon, although 54% of new hampshire republican voters still would. presidential elections in this co
hayes tonight on this special two hour edition of all in. it was an hour-long shouting match in the oval office which nearly ended in a fistfight. there was almost a physical brawl between a top white house aide and former trump national security adviser michael flynn. i am referring of course to that now infamous a white house meeting in december 2020. flynn, along with a crew of trump s lawyers like rudy giuliani presented an avalanche of baseless claims of election fraud while the white house lawyers debunked all of them. at that meeting, sydney powell presented trump with the draft executive order that would have directed the military to seize our nation s voting machines. part of that plan we have also been by sydney carroll herself, a special counsel and could have impose martial law and required everyone run of the election. obviously that didn t thankfully end up happening. they mutinous ideas pitched in the oval office meeting a date not exist in they are part of a