thank you. could legal questions about how to resolve trump s travel ban end up before the u.s. supreme court? galoloria marshall, a constitutional law professor, joins me this morning, good morning. good morning. the trump camp says it s eminently constitutional because the president has wide authority to determine who gets to come into the united states. it s true, the president has this authority, this is from the alien and sedition act, going way back in history. but due process concerns are all over this executive order. in the order itself, and i ve read it, it says that they don t want and should not have people in the country who don t support the constitution. that is in it. i don t know if people have actually read this executive order. there is a lot in it, things about biometrics and everything else. a lot of americans would say of course they shouldn t be
enforce the alien and sedition act so presidents have done this traditionally since world war ii. it s totally out of hand. now i profoundly disagree with juan. it is not the number of executive orders signed by the president, it s those executive orders which intrude into the province of the law-making branch which is the congress. the president of the united states said to 11 million illegal immigrants, hey, do, a, b, c, d, and, e, i won t deport you. where d did he get that from, he made it up so instead of enforcing the law he s telling 11 million people how to avoid obeying the law. i think i reached the tipping point with senator feinstein of california, the dramatic change on enough is enough with the spying will cause the congress, i believe, to begin to take back power that it has been ceding to presidents since the new deal. that s precisely it. the congress is at fault here. yes. for doing nothing.