Aligned Vision News Today

In Virtek Vision International ULC v. Assembly Guidance Systems, Inc. [1], the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB)...

In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in holding that certain claims of the Virtek patent (U.S. Patent No. 10,052,734) were unpatentable as obvious.

In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decision in holding that certain claims of the Virtek patent (U.S. Patent No....

NEWS STATEMENT Statement from Caribbean Utilities Company on Misinformation Surrounding Renewable Energy in the Cayman Islands April 12,...

Virtek Vision International ULC v. Assembly Guidance Systems, Inc. d/b/a Aligned Vision, Nos. 2022-1998, -2022 (Fed. Cir. (PTAB) Mar. 27, 2024). Opinion by Moore, joined by Hughes and...

Defining Indefiniteness: When Are Claim Limitations Contradictory? In Maxell, Ltd., v. Amperex Technology Limited, Appeal No. 23-1194, the Federal Circuit held that  two...

VIRTEK VISION INTERNATIONAL ULC, v. ASSEMBLY GUIDANCE SYSTEMS, INC., DBA ALIGNED VISION - Before Moore, Hughes, and Stark.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...

Harris Brumfield v. IBG LLC, Appeal No. 2022-1630 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2024) In our case of the week, the Federal Circuit addressed three issues in a dispute that dates ba...

In a precedential decision authored by Chief Judge Moore, the Federal Circuit on Wednesday partially reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling that certain claims of Virtek Vision International’s patent were unpatentable, finding the Board erred as a matter of law in its analysis.

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.