allowed federal official to quickly expel migrants, ostensibly because of the pandemic. more now from cnn white house reporter priscilla albert. but alisyn, this ruling is ultimately a victory for republican-led states that sought to intervene in this case and block the termination of title 42. now, the white house responded to this order saying that they will comply with it. but they also pointed the finger at congress, saying it is on them to pass immigration reform. they also made their position quite clear, saying that, quote, title 42 is a public health measure not a immigration enforcement measure. and it should not be instead it indefinitely. since this has come down, there is already confusion around the border. immigrant advocates and groups have been disseminating information to migrants on both side of the border to try to convey what this means, which is ultimately that this public health authority that was invoked at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic will c
sought to intervene in this case and block the termination of title 42. now, the white house responded to this order saying that they will comply with it. but they also pointed the finger at congress, saying it is on them to pass immigration reform. they also made their position quite clear, saying that, quote, title 42 is a public health measure not a immigration enforcement measure. and it should not be instead it indefinitely. since this has come down, there is already confusion around the border. immigrant advocates and groups have been disseminating information to migrants on both side of the border to try to convey what this means, which is ultimately that this public health authority that was invoked at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic will continue to remain in effect. meaning that officials can continue to expel migrants who they encounter at the u.s. mexico border. now legal alert, the attorney of the american civil liberties union said it is, quote, deeply d
are there not laws? what is the recourse for this? there are serious legal questions, alisyn he. we ll see what the answers are. i suspect he will be investigated. you have somebody who lied about his biography, he lied about his income, he lied about his jobs, he lied about his family being in the holocaust, that was particularly offensive to me, as the child of holocaust survivors, what an insult. but when you lie about over $700, 000, if he did, and you file forms with congress and with the federal election commission, if those numbers also have any element of fabrication to them, yes, there are potential federal crimes. there are state crimes, i think, and there is the house ethics committee. so i think a variety of people are gonna say, hey, are those financial figures also? we don t know the answers yet, but, boy there is not a lot of reason to trust what he has put down on those forms. i think we can all agree this is not over yet. gentlemen, thank you very much. next, miami
allowed federal official to quickly expel migrants, ostensibly because of the pandemic. more now from cnn white house reporter priscilla albert. but alisyn, this ruling is ultimately a victory for republican-led states that sought to intervene in this case and block the termination of title 42. now, the white house responded to this order saying that they will comply with it. but they also pointed the finger at congress, saying it is on them to pass immigration reform. they also made their position quite clear, saying that, quote, title 42 is a public health measure not a immigration enforcement measure. and it should not be instead it indefinitely. since this has come down, there is already confusion around the border. immigrant advocates and groups have been disseminating information to migrants on both side of the border to try to convey what this means, which is ultimately that this public health authority that was invoked at the onset of the coronavirus pandemic will continue to