going from 10% better than garbage. i mean, she actually called the u.s. policies right now garbage. how do you react to that? well this new deal it s a crazy new deal. it s a bad deal. i d take a look at what they proposed what she has introduced and 11 members of the senate have is what s the cost, what are the consequences and will it work? well the cost is staggering, astronomical. $93 trillion. that would empty everyone s bank account in america from warren buffett all the way on down, so the country cannot afford it. individually, the consequences are people are going to lose their jobs and it s going to be about $65,000 per family per year plus higher energy costs, higher heating costs. they want to get rid of airplanes, anybody that works in an airline industry they re going to be out of work. the energy industry out of work and what about the air force? you get rid of airplanes, vladimir putin is not going to get rid of his air force just if we get rid of ours and the
tacit green light to go ahead and do this. in terms of agendas, if you read that article, it says that a current and former u.s. officials, at any time we have seen former u.s. officials quoted, they are not any time, but many times, when we see former u.s. officials quoted in stories that are critical of the trump administration, as they tend to be people who were in the past administration, who don t think of this president has the seriousness to deal with information that they believe needs to be dealt within a certain way. they are only too happy to get it out there to make this white house him as president look bad. martha: john, thank you very much. let s bring in a judge for one more comment. i want to build on the reporting of our colleagues. as catherine reports, special access privilege is the highest categorization of a state secret. in the hundreds of thousands of emails, hillary clinton sent, there were only three or four and her three years that were in this category.
information that was really owned by the united states and for the president to share this information had come from one of our partners based on the reporting in the region and also based on the reporting, it was highly sensitive information that came from an espionage operation. based on my decade of covering this area, that is code for a human source or human spying. those were among the most delicate and likely to be compromised, martha. martha: thank you very much. we will go back to catherine. also watching with microphone outside the white house for h.r. mcmaster is expected any moment. let s bring in chris stirewalt and judge andrew napolitano. the way that this piece is written, chris, let me start with you, it all is shocking. a quote from a senior official, former u.s. official, trump seems to be very reckless, doesn t grasp the gravity of the things that he is dealing with. there is definitely an effort in
this piece to paint him as bumbling with this information, chris. the way it reads, again, i don t know, the way it reads is that because the administration notified or was obliged to notify the senate intelligence that this was a piece of raw steak that was thrown out right in front of senators who were already gunning for the president, who look at him and his handling of the russian investigation and other things, and they hear that and that immediately results in the leak, the allegation, that stuff. that is how this reads to me, once you enforce inform the senate about this, from the reaction of both parties, you wd guess there is some bipartisan spirit, this is them saying, whoa. martha: someone in this room had to leak this information. three of them have made statements. h.r. mcmaster, tillerson, dina powell. we know russian officials were in that room. who else was a mudroom?
at had to have come from and there, correct? unless they felt obliged to inform the senate, by the way, things were said and we are putting you on notice that this occurred. they come out of due diligence, how to notify the other parts of the intelligence apparatus, then, you open up the universe of the different people who will pick up their phone, call their reporter, say, you are not going to believe this. martha: exactly. judge, your thoughts? under the law, the intelligence community is obliged to inform a breach of this nature to the leadership of the house and senate intelligence committee, which apparently has not been done. under the law of the white house, it is required to make the same kind of report. politically, this feeds the narrative that the president, that some people in the intelligence committee want to make, for better or for worse, that the president of the united states of america is not competent to handle the nation s