Page 5 - Allocation Office News Today

Property ownership we want to make sure you have enough insurance one million we have to h have that by law to indemnify everyone else in the building thank you thank you, mr. Turner. Supervisors im dennis last week he sent each you, you each of the board of supervisors a copy of our letter 5 backseats points i want to open the legislation as it stands stop the ellis act for the purpose of shortterm rentals or an owner renting out vacant unit for s drs the reading and mooibd of the legislation i...

The coalition of better housing i want to talk about 3 concerns its important to the city and important to our members of the coalition who rent to san franciscans of every kind 3 issues i would like you to consider wed like make sure that a monthly rental rate is enforced for the maximum rent to the unit and an owner of the register should be able to conform that remedy amount and what the renter is representing it out or they cant rent it out at an elevated rate we appreciate were part of the ...

Our tenants by having people in and out of our building that the tenants dont know its not safe we want to know who those people are in the, i dont understand how the rent control can go offered on airbnb theyre part of the Affordable Housing and should be kept that way when i have a tenant that pays 500 a month they can only rent their unit out for 250 a month by changing that and allowing them to make it any another way you make it a hotel basis how can you stay within the rent control laws im...

Further on our under your discretionary review authorization calendar on delores street has been withdrawn and item 18 for case at 372121st strait has also been withdrawn i have nothing of your duty and i have no speaker cards. Is there any comments other than the items proposed for continuance . Public comment on items proposed for continuance okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed on items for continuance. Did i hear you to continue item number 14 . No no i wanted to make sure thank you. O...

Helpful to people and not to be invading by real an example of City Government supporting a better quality of life for people i wanted to say that the expansion to the south of market area with the other locations including the 6th street corridor i know having worked there for many years is critical and appreciatively of the data driven approach were seeing good results and strongly support this as well and its extremely Cost Effective but the driving is giving people dignity and supporting the...

Planning Code Amendment is proposed for continuance until march fifth 2015 commissioners further on our under your discretionary review authorization calendar on delores street has been withdrawn and item 18 for case at 372121st strait has also been withdrawn i have nothing of your duty and i have no speaker cards. Is there any comments other than the items proposed for continuance . Public comment on items proposed for continuance okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed on items for continua...

The west side. If you add the address of 39 to the west side footing youre done there. If you add this Foundation Work which would be on the east side and then clarify the 39 and 41 we cant do that. We can do that. We can . Yes, if that drawing is for the east side then why is there a second permit needed . Its one permit for all the work. Go for it. It can be accomplished without any new permit required. I want mr. Duffy to say yes. Okay. I think the most important thing is that we get both num...

Impact fees the portion of the development that was approved under the most recently planning action as the gentleman explained they have agreed to pay the impact fees early for even though they could be deferred they didnt agree to retroactively pay the fees for the impact that fee it was under the agreement. Also at the Planning Commission this issue was raised and we consoled with the City Attorney and the ordinance is under the per view under the building inspection its actually a program in...

The appeal. Thank you very much id like to ask you about the standard under 320 of the planning code and i find i dont know obviously you didnt argue but as i understand it we have Board Authority hero to determine whether or not the additional 6 floors it appropriate. My understanding it is the language that needs to be met whether this development promotes Public Welfare convenience net and id like to hear you on that standard yeah. I mean, i would say first, the Planning Commission made detai...

Inspired to begin with even if it was appealable. I dont see any prejudice to having the developer pay that at the completion of the project. The law didnt provide for land depression concerns if so the losers would have include that in the legislation. Im inclined to deny the appeal. I also find under the planning code section 321 b the Planning Commission considered the factors that needed to be considered and prepared to uphold their findings anyone else . I find this to be difficult in the s...