now that the shelby county commission done their job. i m so glad we get to get back to doing our job and what is our job? to elevate the voices of the six kids the six people in nashville. three children who were just 9 years old. now both lawmakers expelled by republicans in the tennessee legislature have been reinstated, proving just how pointless that exercise was. state representative justin j. pearson joins me in just a moment and the two pillars of the republican party, trump and fox, are all friendly again and there are big new developments in both of their perilous legal situations. and late today, a new threatening letter is received by manhattan d.a. alvin bragg s office containing a suspicious white powder but we begin tonight with the triumphant return of the tennessee three. earlier today, the shelby county commission voted to reappoint justin j. pearson to his duly elected position, to represent the good citizens of district 86 not a single republic
very good to be with you. i m alex witt in for katy tur. what jack smith s case, that is the question being batted around before judge aileen cannon in court today as major questions about her own role in the trial hang over proceedings. there is still no trial date in sight. instead, to the frustration of many, cannon is hearing out what several legal experts have called another long shot argument to dismiss charges against the former president. yesterday, the new york times reported cannon rejected urges from two federal judges that she not take the case when it was firsthanded to her last june. the question is why, when a huge chunk of her rulings have drawn criticism from the prosecution and legal scholars. is it inexperience, she was only on the bench just over a year. is it potential bias? she has shown unusual favor to trump by intervening in the mar-a-lago investigation before he was indicted or is it simply judge cannon s way of proceeding over such a high stakes h
states, not saying a word about that are going to address the crowd all about an hour ago. were up on that and we are up on this, obviously the big news is that hunter biden under the gun and guilty on all federal gun charges and know the question is whether he is going to face jail on those charges. again with all three convictions here. there s a possibility to spend as much as 25 years in jail. while unlikely it is out there and there is another trial coming up on tax related matters. welcome everybody i m happy to have you, i m neil cavuto, let s get right to it, david spunt in wilmington, delaware, what went down in the courthouse today because was quick, david? neal moylett was quick and it was tense. quiet in the courtroom when the verdict was read. the word guilty memorial day three times with the son of a sitting president just looking forward, things happen so quickly of the all juries only deliberated for two hour to an hour yesterday things happen so quickly th
carley, thank you very much. carley: sure. steve: # 10 people were able to score seats inside the courtroom yesterday. in the back row were actually three of the federal charges who have presided over some of the january 6th proceedings. they were all in plain clothes. they took the day off. because they wanted to see it because they felt it was part of history, and it certainly was. carley: next hearing august 28th. 0:00 a.m. trump does not have to be in attendance for that one. the real judge they used a different judge yesterday than going to be presiding over. steve: a magistrate. carley: this hearing where the trial determined. prosecution wants the trial to start in a speedy fashion which is 70 days from now. and the defense, trump s lawyers are saying, listen, the government got three and a half years to build their case, let s make this fair and give us three and a half as well. i don t know if that s going to happen. brian: off the top of to your head think to yo
august, it means that is it preindictment motion, it is very likely to fail, people don t have certain kinds of rights they can bring at that point. the timeline is very specific, declassified documents case at mar-a-lago, and the argument, maybe you could and didn t think you should but of course obstruction related to the actual proceedings themselves, through doj, if she s getting the timeline, making it prove that the doj will go before hand quick much more likely they will go before hand, and exact date, and the incentives to go first, because of the alvin bragg situation. and whatever it is they want to be were it presents, and